Bombay HC overturns grampanchayat order to firm to cease erecting mobile tower claiming radiation can harm people’s health

By Lokmat English Desk | Published: July 21, 2023 08:12 PM2023-07-21T20:12:42+5:302023-07-21T20:13:01+5:30

The Bombay High Court upheld a grampanchayat resolution ordering a company based in Pune to halt construction on its ...

Bombay HC overturns grampanchayat order to firm to cease erecting mobile tower claiming radiation can harm people’s health | Bombay HC overturns grampanchayat order to firm to cease erecting mobile tower claiming radiation can harm people’s health

Bombay HC overturns grampanchayat order to firm to cease erecting mobile tower claiming radiation can harm people’s health

The Bombay High Court upheld a grampanchayat resolution ordering a company based in Pune to halt construction on its mobile tower, holding that there cannot be a ban on such towers in the absence of scientific evidence showing that radiation from such towers is harmful to health or has a carcinogenic effect.

A division bench of Justices S B Shukre and Rajesh Patil in its order on Thursday permitted Pune-based Indus Towers to set up a mobile tower at Chikhalhol at Khanapur taluka in Sangli district. The company had challenged a July 2022 resolution passed by the Chikhalhol grampanchayat, directing it to stop the work of erecting a mobile tower there, after some villagers filed a complaint that the radiation emitted by mobile towers was harmful to health and can possibly be carcinogenic.

The bench in its order noted that the fear expressed by the villagers was without any basis and that there was no relevant scientific material to back their claims. The resolution passed by the grampanchayat following apprehension that radiation emitted by a mobile tower has harmful and carcinogenic effects, is not based upon any scientific material, the high court said.

It further said that under law if any agency/institution or person seeks to deny a benefit or right to another on a special ground like the present case, then a special burden of proof is put on the complainant to establish the soundness of such a ground. But, in the present case, the grampanchayat has failed to discharge the special burden of proof which was on its shoulders, the court said, adding that the resolution passed by the grampanchayat cannot be sustained in the eye of law and deserves to be quashed.

The bench in its order noted that the role of the grampanchayat in the matter of erection of mobile towers was only confined to issuing a no objection certificate (NOC) in terms of a state government resolution issued in 2015.

Open in app