Delhi HC dismisses death row convicts plea seeking information under RTI in 2006 Mumbai train blasts

By Lokmat English Desk | Published: April 18, 2023 06:21 PM2023-04-18T18:21:45+5:302023-04-18T18:22:55+5:30

Delhi High Court dismissed a petition by a death row convict in the 2006 Mumbai train blast case seeking ...

Delhi HC dismisses death row convicts plea seeking information under RTI in 2006 Mumbai train blasts | Delhi HC dismisses death row convicts plea seeking information under RTI in 2006 Mumbai train blasts

Delhi HC dismisses death row convicts plea seeking information under RTI in 2006 Mumbai train blasts

Delhi High Court dismissed a petition by a death row convict in the 2006 Mumbai train blast case seeking disclosure of information pertaining to the ban imposed on terrorist outfit Indian Mujahideen.

Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique had filed an application under the RTI Act seeking background notes of the Centre and reports of state governments of Gujarat, Delhi and Andhra Pradesh in relation to the ban on the organisation, which was stated to have carried out the blast. The outfit was proscribed under the stringent anti-terror law Unlawful Activities(Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Petitioner challenged in the high court an order passed by the Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) on June 13, 2019 denying him the information on the ground that it was covered under the exemptions provided in the RTI Act.

While refusing to interfere with the CIC’s decision, Justice Prathiba M Singh said the information sought by the petitioner has far reaching consequences and has to be seen from the larger issue of safety and security of the public and the nation. It said the information Siddique has sought, if provided, will have a bearing on sovereignty and security of the country.

A perusal of the information shows that the same has far reaching consequences. The same organisation is stated to be involved in various unfortunate incidents since 2005, some resulting in severe loss of life and property, said the court. It observed that the disclosure of the information sought by the petitioner can jeopardize the sources of the government in relation to the ban on Indian Mujahideen and the CIC’s opinion that sharing the information would endanger the sources is correct and does not require interference.

The trial court’s order of sentence is still pending confirmation by the Bombay High Court and the reports of the state governments and the Centre’s background notes would prove the innocence of the petitioner as well as violation of his human rights, the plea said.

Open in app