City
Epaper

Centre notifies appointments in Allahabad, Patna and Uttarakhand High Courts

By IANS | Updated: January 5, 2026 19:15 IST

New Delhi, Jan 5 The Centre on Monday notified the appointment of four advocates as judges in three ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 5 The Centre on Monday notified the appointment of four advocates as judges in three High Courts, acting on the recommendations of the Supreme Court Collegium.

In a post on social media platform X, Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Law and Justice Arjun Ram Meghwal said that the President, in exercise of the powers conferred by the Constitution of India and after consultation with the Chief Justice of India (CJI), was pleased to appoint advocates Ritesh Kumar and Praveen Kumar as judges of the Patna High Court.

Advocate Jai Krishna Upadhyay has been appointed as a judge of the Allahabad High Court, while advocate Siddhartha Sah has been appointed as an additional judge of the Uttarakhand High Court, the minister said.

The appointments follow recommendations made by the Supreme Court Collegium in its earlier meetings.

In February 2025, the apex court Collegium, then headed by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, had approved the proposal for the appointment of several advocates, including Ritesh Kumar, as judges of the Patna High Court.

Similarly, advocate Jai Krishna Upadhyay was among the names recommended by the Supreme Court Collegium in September 2025 for elevation to the Allahabad High Court. However, on September 26, 2025, when 24 judges were appointed to the Allahabad High Court, his name did not figure in the list cleared by the Centre.

With regard to advocate Siddhartha Sah, the Supreme Court Collegium had, in October 2023, recommended his elevation to the Uttarakhand High Court after assessing his professional standing and suitability.

The Collegium had noted that he enjoys a good reputation at the Bar and that nothing adverse had come to notice against his integrity.

“The observation made by the Government should not come in the way of the recommendation, particularly when the inputs placed in the file indicate that nothing adverse has come to notice against his integrity,” the Collegium had said in a statement uploaded on the apex court’s website.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentManchu Manoj comes onboard Nandamuri Balakrishna–Gopichand Malineni’s #NBK111

NationalLucknow varsity sacks professor over obscene call to female student and NEET paper leak 'offer'

PoliticsAir India AI-171 crash probe in final stages, report expected soon: Civil Aviation Minister

MumbaiMumbai Monorail To Restart Soon After 8-Month Suspension; Metro 2B, Aqua Line Integration Underway

Other Sports'Words can't do justice to the kind of ability he possesses': Bangar's special praise for Sooryavanshi’s

National Realted Stories

National"Even ChatGPT may not always provide accurate information, rationalism is necessary": DMK's Kanimozhi

NationalUttar Pradesh: Fire breaks out at 'New Auto Life Motors' workshop near Rapid Metro station in Ghaziabad

NationalDelhi HC issues notice to Centre, regulatory agencies on PIL alleging illegal export of life-saving drugs

NationalTVK Cabinet expansion: Aadhav Arjuna clarifies stand on AIADMK rebel camp led by Shanmugham

NationalOver 25,000 medical shops remain shut in Telangana