City
Epaper

Court dismisses plea by Delhi police, slaps Rs 25000 fine in north-east violence case

By ANI | Published: July 14, 2021 11:17 PM

A Sessions Court in Delhi has fined the city police Rs 25,000 while dismissing its appeal challenging a Magistrate Court order directing registration of a separate First Information Report (FIR) in connection with a gunshot injury to a man during the February violence in the north-east part of the national capital.

Open in App

A Sessions Court in Delhi has fined the city police Rs 25,000 while dismissing its appeal challenging a Magistrate Court order directing registration of a separate First Information Report (FIR) in connection with a gunshot injury to a man during the February violence in the north-east part of the national capital.

Additional Sessions Judge Vinod Yadav has dismissed the petition filed by the Station House Officer (SHO) of Bhajanpura challenging a Magistrate Court order.

"I do not find any merit in this revision petition. The same accordingly stands dismissed with a cost of Rs 25,000 which shall be deposited with Delhi Legal Services Authority by DCP (North-East) within one week from today and the said amount shall be recovered from the petitioner and his supervising officers, who have miserably failed in their statutory duties in this case after holding a due inquiry in this regard," the court said.

"The mandate of the Delhi High Court Rules, referred to by the learned counsel for the respondent has not been followed by either the police or by MM in the matter, which clearly goes on to establish that the investigation even in case FIR No.64/2020, PS Bhajanpura has been done in a most casual, callous and farcical manner," it added.

SHO Bhajanpura has challenged Metropolitan Magistrate's order dated October 21, 2020; whereby a petition filed under Section 156 (3) Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr. P.C) by the victims Nasir Ali was allowed and the police were directed to register a separate FIR on the complaint of the respondent within 24 hours of the receipt of the order.

Complainant Nasir had sent his complaint to the police naming the persons who reportedly wounded him on February 24, 2020, but the police did not act on his complaint. Thereafter, he approached a Magistrate Court with his grievances and sought to lodge a separate FIR.

But police maintained that Nasir's grievance was "duly stands redressed" as it had registered an FIR under appropriate sections and there is no need to lodge a separate FIR.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Magistrate courtSessions CourtVinod YadavNasir ali
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalBeing a woman is not a criterion for granting bail, says Karnataka HC

NationalBest bakery case: 2 accused acquitted, lawyers call Session Court's verdict a 'victory'

NationalKerala: Court sends accused Pakistani national to 14 day judicial custody after drugs seized in Indian waters worth Rs 25,000 cr

NationalAssam CM, PM Modi attend closing ceremony of Platinum Jubilee celebration of Gauhati High Court

PoliticsRahul's first trip to Wayanad on Tuesday after disqualification from LS

National Realted Stories

National'We don’t design courses', Delhi HC rejects PIL seeking 4-year LLB course

NationalIndian High Commission in Sri Lanka Dismisses Blame, Says No Firms Involved in Providing ‘Visa on Arrival’ at Colombo Airport

NationalElection Commission appoints 15 expenditure observers for Punjab

NationalSex scandal: SIT rejects Prajwal Revanna’s request; lookout notice issued, another victim comes forward

NationalPhase-3 LS polls: It's experienced vs first-timers in Bihar