City
Epaper

Electoral bonds scheme infringes upon right to information of voter: CJI Chandrachud

By IANS | Updated: February 15, 2024 11:25 IST

New Delhi, Feb 15 Saying that financial contribution to a political party could lead to quid pro quo ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 15 Saying that financial contribution to a political party could lead to quid pro quo arrangements, Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud on Thursday said that the electoral bonds scheme by anonymizing contributions to the political parties infringe upon right to information of the voter provided under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

Pronouncing judgement on pleas challenging the validity of the electoral bonds scheme, CJI Chandrachud said, “There is also a legitimate possibility that financial contribution to a political party would lead to quid pro quo arrangements because of the closed nexus between money and politics. Quid pro quo arrangements could be in the form of introducing a policy change or granting a license to the person making financial contribution to the political party in power. The electoral bond scheme and the impugned provisions to the extent that they infringe upon the right to information of the voter by anonymizing contributions through electoral bonds are violative of Article 19(1)(a).”

Saying that political contributions give a seat at the table to the contributor, i.e., it enhances access to legislators and this access also translates into influence over policy making, CJI Chandrachud added that the information of funding of political parties is essential for effective exercise of the choice of voting.

“One of the factors, which contributes to political inequality, is the difference in the ability of persons to influence political decisions because of economic inequality. Economic inequality leads to deferring levels of political engagement because of the deep association between money and politics,” he said.

In November 2023, a 5-judge Constitution Bench headed by CJI Chandrachud and comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, B.R. Gavai, J.B. Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra had reserved its verdict on pleas challenging the validity of the electoral bonds scheme after hearing the arguments for three days in a row.

The petitioners before the apex court had argued that the Electoral Bond Scheme violates the citizen's fundamental right to information under Article 19(1) and it enables backdoor lobbying and promotes corruption and eliminates level playing field for political parties in the Opposition.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

LifestyleHow Long Should You Wait to Drink Water After a Meal for Better Digestion?

TechnologyNagaland University’s biodegradable gelatin-electrolyte to boost performance of supercapacitors

Other SportsIWL to be played in two phase following clubs’ request: AIFF

EntertainmentKartik Aaryan-starrer ‘Tu Meri Main Tera, Main Tera Tu Meri’ hops on December 25 release after ‘Alpha’ moves to April

NationalThe grip of monopoly: Indian commerce as battleground in the British Parliament (From the Archives)

National Realted Stories

NationalHM Amit Shah blames 'Jungle Raj' for Bihar's industrial decline, vows to revive sugar mills

NationalNuapada bypoll: Naveen Patnaik calls BJP govt 'heroes in publicity, zero in performance'

NationalMental Health of Child Takes Priority: Uttarakhand High Court Rejects Grandfather’s Visitation Application

NationalHospitalisations under Bengal’s own health insurance scheme hit 1 crore: Mamata Banerjee

NationalBJP asks K'taka govt to share details of B'luru tunnel project, says it should first fix potholes