City
Epaper

HC notice on scribe Aarti Tikoo's plea against Twitter's decision to 'lock' her account

By IANS | Published: January 11, 2022 3:09 PM

New Delhi, Jan 11 The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued a notice on journalist Aarti Tikoo's plea ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 11 The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued a notice on journalist Aarti Tikoo's plea challenging Twitter's decision to lock her account and deleting her tweet allegedly in violation of its rules on hateful conduct.

Seeking the response of the Centre and Twitter Inc, a single bench of Justice Rekha Palli granted three weeks' time for filing a counter-affidavit and two weeks' time for filing of the rejoinder in the matter.

The journalist, identified as a member of the Kashmiri Pandit community, in her petition approached the court following the ban on her account in the microblogging platform after she raised an alarm about Islamic terrorists from Kashmir issuing death threats to her brother.

It further contended that the action of Respondent 2A (Twitter Inc) has perhaps the intended effect of silencing the voice of the petitioner who is a Kashmiri Pandit at the behest of Islamists. This is in effect a violation of her right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and forces her to relive the trauma that she experienced as a refugee in her own country.

The petition contended that on December 14, the petitioner's cousin Sahil Tikoo had a discussion in a Twitter space wherein he was called an Indian agent, and a lot of other allegations were made against him.

On December 15, tagging the Home Minister Office's handle on Twitter, Aarti Tikoo - founder and editor of 'The New Indian' - had posted a tweet which read: "My brother @TikooSahil_ who lives in Srinagar, is being openly threatened by jihadi terrorists sitting in Kashmir-India, and their handlers in Pakistan, UK and US. Is anyone watching? Are we sitting ducks waiting to be shot dead by Islamists or will you crackdown on them?".

Her plea stated that it is clear that the arbitrary action of Respondent No.2 in suspending the account of the Petitioner for merely calling out radical Islamism is something that deserves to be censured and quashed.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: New DelhisrinagarDelhi High CourtTwitterRekha palliSahil tikoo
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalFire Breaks Out in Delhi House, Four Vehicles Gutted in Blaze

NationalExcise Policy Case: Delhi HC Lists Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea Against ED Summons for Hearing on July 11

National‘He is a Monster’: Delhi High Court Holds Father Guilty of Raping Minor Daughter for Over Two Years

NationalAAP To Be Made Accused in Delhi Excise Policy Scam Case: ED Tells High Court

MaharashtraBhima-Koregaon Case: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Gautam Navlakha in Elgar Parishad Case After Two Years of House Arrest

National Realted Stories

NationalDelhi Police file FIR in Swati Maliwal ‘assault’ case, name CM Kejriwal's aide Bibhav Kumar

NationalHD Revanna gets temporary relief from court in sexual harassment case

NationalGoof-up in 4-year-old's surgery at Kozhikode Medical College Hospital, doctor suspended

NationalJyotiraditya Scindia performs last rites of mother Madhavi Raje Scindia in Gwalior

NationalLalu Prasad's family will be unemployed after June 4, claims Samrat Choudhary