City
Epaper

Kerala HC stays criminal proceedings against Ramdev, Balkrishna

By IANS | Updated: April 3, 2025 15:26 IST

Kochi, April 3 The Kerala High Court on Thursday stayed criminal proceedings against Patanjali Ayurved's promoters, Baba Ramdev ...

Open in App

Kochi, April 3 The Kerala High Court on Thursday stayed criminal proceedings against Patanjali Ayurved's promoters, Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna, in the misleading advertisement case.

A single judge bench of Justice V G Arun stayed the proceedings pending before the district court in Palakkad for three months.

The prosecution against Patanjali and its promoters was instituted based on a complaint filed by the Palakkad Drug Inspector, alleging that they shared a misleading advertisement for a product, 'Mukta Vati Extra Power', on September 30, 2023.

The complainant alleged that the 'Mukta Vati Extra Power' advertisement violated the provisions of the Drugs and Magical Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954.

The petitioner further alleged that the advertisement was published in a newspaper to induce patients to purchase the drugs, which will result in self-medication and use of the drug without the direction of a medical practitioner, leading to undesirable and irreparable effects on the health of persons.

Later, an inspection was conducted in the premises of Patanjali, and the drug was found stocked in the premises for sale.

As per the complaint, "It was a drug as defined under Section 2(b) of the Act and that the label of the product contained 'Indications- Useful in Blood Pressure (Cardiac Disorder)', which is alleged to be an advertisement within the meaning of Section 2(a) of the Act."

After that, Ramdev and Balkrishna approached the High Court seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings against them.

In their plea, they further pointed out, "The word magic remedy is defined as a drug having miraculous powers. The object of section 3(d) is to suggest/calculate to lead the use of the drug, such as a magical remedy is not advertised."

"The advertisement says that the medicine can be used only after a prescription by a registered medical practitioner, which means that it does not lead to the drug's use straightaway. So, the offence under section 3(d) is not made out," they claimed.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

TechnologyIndia plans big electronics push to boost local value addition to 40 pc: Ashwini Vaishnaw

BusinessIndia plans big electronics push to boost local value addition to 40 pc: Ashwini Vaishnaw

InternationalMoS Sanjay Seth inaugurates India Pavilion at Dubai Air Show 2025

BusinessSukarya Empowers Adolescent Girls Through Gender Equality Program Supported by OakNorth Certification Ceremony Held on 13 November 2025 in Gurugram

BusinessFrom Chai Breaks to Boardrooms: Cranberries Power India’s Healthy Snacking Boom

National Realted Stories

NationalTribal Pride Day: Delhi Assembly honours over 200 visitors from Maoist-hit districts

NationalIndia’s merchandise and services exports up 4.84 pc at $491.8 billion in April-Oct

NationalPutin aide Patrushev arrives in Delhi, meets NSA Doval

NationalDharmasthala case: Karnataka High Court quashes externment order issued to activist Mahesh Shetty Thimarody

NationalRs 3 lakh compensation for family of student who died in 2015 Myladuthurai college accident