City
Epaper

Madras HC inquiry confirms misconduct allegations against Kancheepuram district judge

By IANS | Updated: September 23, 2025 21:25 IST

Chennai, Sep 23 The Madras High Court has confirmed allegations of misconduct against Kancheepuram Principal District and Sessions ...

Open in App

Chennai, Sep 23 The Madras High Court has confirmed allegations of misconduct against Kancheepuram Principal District and Sessions Judge Pa.U. Chemmal, who earlier this month ordered the judicial custody of a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) over a personal dispute with his former Personal Security Officer (PSO).

Justice N. Sathish Kumar, after examining an inquiry report by Registrar (Vigilance) Jacintha Martin, directed the High Court Registry to place it before the Vigilance Committee, comprising senior judges, for disciplinary proceedings.

He also instructed that the report be forwarded to the Transfer Committee for immediate action, observing that it was "not conducive" to allow the judge to continue in Kancheepuram.

The order came on a petition filed by the Kancheepuram Superintendent of Police, who challenged the district judge’s September 8 decision to send the DSP to custody.

Justice Sathish Kumar had swiftly set aside that order on September 9 and ordered a vigilance inquiry into the allegations.

According to Additional Public Prosecutor K.M.D. Muhilan, the Superintendent of Police, DSP, and the judge’s former PSO R. Lokeshwaran gave statements to the Registrar (Vigilance).

The inquiry found that the judge had pressured the police to register a case against Lokeshwaran and his father-in-law, a bakery owner, suspecting them of spreading false information about him. The DSP was ordered to be sent to custody, allegedly for not arresting the former aide.

The inquiry also revealed fresh details, including the judge’s alleged pressure on a Food Safety Officer to raid the bakery. The FSO appeared before the vigilance authority and confirmed this.

Furthermore, the report mentioned other instances of misconduct, such as coercive action against a local pharmacy that had refused to sell medicines without a valid prescription.

Justice Sathish Kumar, after reviewing the findings, held that the report substantiates the charges of misuse of judicial power. He ordered that appropriate disciplinary measures be considered at the earliest.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Other Sports"Have informed police, CCTV shows thieves taking away...": Olympic medalist boxer Mary Kom on theft at her Faridabad house

TechnologyCountdown begins for govt employees to pick between NPS and UPS as deadline nears

BusinessCountdown begins for govt employees to pick between NPS and UPS as deadline nears

NationalPak intelligence officer who was in contact with Sonam Wangchuk arrested: Top cop

EntertainmentRSS Chief Mohan Bhawat releases 'Sangh Prarthana' audiotape by Shankar Mahadevan

National Realted Stories

NationalCongress calls Sonam Wangchuk's arrest under NSA 'draconian', blames BJP for crisis

NationalOppn leaders fight for their own seats, BJP workers fight for the nation: HM Amit Shah

National'Cong-led govt in K'taka more corrupt': Contractors' body in letter to CM Siddaramaiah

NationalCong-led govt in Himachal harassing people by imposing cess: State BJP chief

NationalTN BJP slams actor Vijay’s DMK-backed politics, says NDA will sweep 2026 polls