City
Epaper

Prasad: Orginal version of Constitution had Akbar, not Babar

By IANS | Updated: November 26, 2019 19:55 IST

Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad Tuesday said there is Akbar not Babar in the original version of the Constitution, as the makers of the Constitution kept in mind the heritage of India.

Open in App

Prasad was speaking at the Constitution Day celebration held at Supreme Court. His comments gain significance in the backdrop of the recent judgement in Ayodhya title dispute where the apex court ruled in the favour of the Hindu side.

The Law Minister, citing the apex court judgement on Ayodhya, said, "Right to faith is also a fundamental right." He also emphasized how successfully the top court adjudicated the competing claims of two faiths.

The apex court had observed that both faiths coexisted at the same site, as Hindus offered prayers to the central dome and Muslim offered namaz at the same site.

He pointed out the apex court judgement highlights that the court has noted the assimilation of traditions in India, which is truly its heritage. Recently, a few parties on the Muslim side have expressed their willingness to challenge the apex court judgement on Ayodhya, where the court allocated five acre for the purpose of construction of mosque in Ayodhya.

According to the Hindu side, the Babri Masjid was built after destroying a temple dedicated to Lord Ram, and its remains were used in the construction of the mosque. According to the ASI report, the underlying structure, on the disputed site, was non-Islamic. The apex court observed that the ASI could not establish that a temple dedicated to Lord Ram was destroyed to build a mosque, and also rejected the Muslim side argument that mosque was built on a vacant land.

The apex court criticised the demolition of the mosque and the desecration of the mosque was placing idols under the central dome. But, it identified that Muslim side could not establish exclusive possession on the site. Instead, Hindus side was able to establish continuous worship at the dispute site.

(Sumit Saxena can be contacted at sumit.s@.in)

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: ayodhyaASISupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalInternational Yoga Day 2025: ASI to Host Event at 81 Historic Sites, No Entry Fee at Monuments on June 21

National Realted Stories

NationalNot a single objection filed by Oppn parties over Bihar SIR so far: ECI source

NationalIndia lost one of its bravest voices: Political leaders mourn former J&K Governor Satyapal Malik

NationalAmit Shah Sets Record as Longest-Serving Home Minister, Surpassing LK Advani

NationalPolice cannot stop PDA pathshala: Akhilesh Yadav

NationalIndia’s household savings rise to Rs 54.6 lakh crore in FY24: MoS