City
Epaper

SC adjourns for 4 weeks Maharashtra govt's plea against stay on Maratha reservation

By ANI | Updated: October 27, 2020 19:35 IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned, for four weeks, the hearing on a plea filed by the Maharashtra government seeking the vacation of its stay on the reservation to the people of the Maratha community in education and jobs in the State.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned, for four weeks, the hearing on a plea filed by the Maharashtra government seeking the vacation of its stay on the reservation to the people of the Maratha community in education and jobs in the State.

A bench of the apex court, headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao, adjourned the hearing on the matter for four weeks. When the matter came up for hearing, Justice Rao called on Maharashtra state lawyer to argue the case.

"Where is he (the lawyer)?" Justice Rao had asked as there was nobody from the side of the Maharashtra government, after which the judges passed over the matter to hear it later and then adjourned it for four weeks.

A three-judge bench of the apex court, which had earlier granted a stay on the Maratha reservation, was hearing plea filed by the Maharashtra government challenging the stay on the reservation to the people of the Maratha community in education and jobs in the state.

The apex court had last month directed that no quota will be granted to people of the Maratha community in education and jobs in the state this year and referred the hearing on a batch of plea challenging the constitutional validity of a Maharashtra law granting Maratha reservation in education and jobs to a larger bench.

The stay was issued on two appeals, including one filed by J Laxman Rao Patil challenging the Bombay High Court order that upheld the constitutional validity of the quota for the Maratha community in education and government jobs in the state.

The Bombay High Court had on June 27, 2019, observed that the 50 per cent cap on total reservations imposed by the Supreme Court could be exceeded in exceptional circumstances.

Another appeal filed by advocate Sanjeet Shukla, a representative of 'Youth for Equality', said the Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018, enacted to grant reservation to the Maratha community people in jobs and education, breached the 50 per cent ceiling on reservation fixed by the top court in its judgment in the Indira Sawhney case.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: J laxman rao patilSanjeet shuklaBombay High CourtSupreme CourtJustice of bombay high courtBombay high
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessRelief for Anil Ambani as Canara Bank Drops ‘Fraud’ Tag on Reliance Communications Loan; ADAG Stocks Rally

MaharashtraHigh Court Orders FIR in Somnath Suryawanshi Custodial Death Case

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai: Environmentalists to Challenge CIDCO in Bombay HC Over Illegal Religious Structures on Belapur Hills

Mumbai'Saying I Love You Doesn’t Mean Desire for Sex': Bombay HC Acquits Man in 2015 Molestation Case

MaharashtraBombay High Court Dismisses All PILs Against Bal Thackeray Memorial

National Realted Stories

NationalEight cities in Madhya Pradesh nominated for 'Swachh Survekshan Awards'

NationalMamata to lead rally against ‘harassment’ of Bengali-speaking migrant workers in other states

NationalAfter Manipur, Mizoram govt to soon start biometric enrolment of Myanmar refugees

NationalTwo cases filed for scuffle at Telangana MLC's office

NationalManipur logs five new Covid cases, state tally rises to 323