City
Epaper

SC asks Ghaziabad Court to adjourn hearing till Jan 31 in case against journalist Rana Ayyub

By ANI | Updated: January 25, 2023 21:10 IST

In a relief to journalist Rana Ayyub, the Supreme Court on Wednesday asked Ghaziabad Special Court to adjourn till ...

Open in App

In a relief to journalist Rana Ayyub, the Supreme Court on Wednesday asked Ghaziabad Special Court to adjourn till January 31 the hearing of the case where summons were issued to the journalist in relation to a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case registered against her by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

A bench of Justices Krishna Murari and V Ramasubramanian asked the Ghaziabad court to adjourn the case and posted Ayyub's plea for hearing before it on January 31 against the summons issued by the Ghaziabad court.

The bench in its order said, "We will hear the case on January 31. In the meantime, Ghaziabad Special Court Anti-corruption is requested to adjourn the hearing fixed for January 27 to a date after January 31. This order is being passed because hearing cannot be concluded (by Supreme Court) due to paucity of time and not on merits."

Ghaziabad court on November 29 issued summon to Ayyub and asked her to appear before it on January 27.

Ayyub has approached the top court challenging the order Ghaziabad court.

During the hearing, advocate Vrinda Grover appearing for Ayyub told the bench that she is raising a jurisdictional issue that the Ghaziabad court has no jurisdiction to hear the matter.

The prosecution complaint ought to have been filed in Mumbai, where the offence is alleged to have taken place, Grover said, adding that the alleged proceeds of the crime are at a bank account in Navi Mumbai and no part of the offence took place in Uttar Pradesh.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate, opposed Ayyub's plea saying she can seek regular remedies.

"Every citizen is equal in the eyes of the law. File anticipatory bail application," he said.

To this, Grover replied, "Not in UP."

Solicitor General took objection to Grover's response and said "Aspersion are being cast on the entire state."

In October 2022, the ED filed a complaint against her before the Ghaziabad court over alleged violations in publicly raising funds.

ED had registered the case on the basis of a complaint registered in September 2021 in Ghaziabad under provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Information Technology Amendment Act and Black Money Act against Ayyub.

It was alleged in the FIR that she illegally acquired funds from the general public in the name of charity by launching fundraiser campaigns.

Ayyub received foreign contributions without registration under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), it was alleged.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Ghaziabad special courtVrinda GroverSupreme CourtRana ayyubSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

ThaneBadlapur School Sexual Assault Case: FIR Still Pending as HC Deadline Passes

MaharashtraUPSC Cheating Case: Pooja Khedkar Denies Allegations of Exam Fraud, Name Change and Fake Disability Certificate

NationalSupreme Court Dismisses PIL on Pahalgam Terror Attack Investigation

NationalJustice BR Gavai Appointed as 52nd Chief Justice of India, Oath on May 14

NationalSexually Explicit Content on OTT, Social Media: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre

National Realted Stories

NationalIn Gujarat’s Sabarkantha, 36,000 people benefit from Ayushman Yojana in past one year

NationalSitting judge of Telangana High Court passes away

NationalPM Modi’s vision driving growth of science and technology: Ajay Kumar Sood

NationalPahalgam attack: SC to hear on Monday PIL seeking more security for tourists in hilly and remote areas

NationalNo longer dependent on lenders for buying seeds, fertilizers: PM-KISAN beneficiaries thank govt