City
Epaper

SC fixes Sep 5 for hearing CM Kejriwal’s pleas

By IANS | Updated: August 23, 2024 13:05 IST

New Delhi, Aug 23 The Supreme Court on Friday fixed September 5 for hearing pleas filed by Delhi ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 23 The Supreme Court on Friday fixed September 5 for hearing pleas filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal seeking bail and challenging his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the alleged excise policy scam.

A bench, headed by Justice Surya Kant decided to adjourn the proceedings after Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S.V. Raju sought a week's time to file a reply on behalf of the CBI.

ASG Raju said that the central investigative agency has already filed its response in one of the petitions filed by CM Kejriwal.

On the other hand, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the AAP supremo, claimed that the reply was filed late on Thursday by CBI with a deliberate design.

Ultimately, the Bench, also comprising Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, allowed the CBI to file its counter affidavit in the matter and granted 2-day time to petitioner to file rejoinder, if any.

Last week, issuing notice on Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest in the corruption case as well as on his distinct petition seeking bail, the top court asked the CBI to file its reply by August 23.

The office report prepared on Thursday by the Assistant Registrar recorded that though advocate M.K. Maroria has filed Vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of CBI, but "he has not filed a counter affidavit".

The office report added that notice has been issued to CBI through special messenger, in addition to 'dasti'.

In his special leave petition filed before the apex court, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) convenor has challenged his arrest and subsequent remand orders, while also pressing for bail in the corruption case.

He assailed the Delhi High Court's August 5 judgment, which ruled that his arrest was neither illegal nor without justifiable grounds because the CBI presented "evidently enough evidence" to warrant his detention and remand.

In its impugned decision, the bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna of the Delhi High Court asked Kejriwal to approach the trial court for interim bail.

On July 29, the CBI had filed its chargesheet before a special court here against the Delhi CM and other accused persons in the excise policy case.

The ED has already filed its prosecution complaint in the money laundering case, naming AAP and its national convenor Kejriwal as accused.

Meanwhile, a court here on Tuesday extended the judicial custody of the Delhi Chief Minister till August 27 in connection with the excise policy case.

The AAP supremo was presented before Special Judge Kaveri Baweja of the Rouse Avenue Court through video conferencing from the Tihar Jail upon the expiry of his previously granted custody.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentShah Rukh Khan makes iconic Met Gala debut in all-black Sabyasachi suit, wears 'King' necklace

Entertainment"I argued my point that it was a family film": Actress Dee Wallace recalls conversation with Spielberg over a film's plot

EntertainmentSuniel Shetty opens up on son-in-law KL Rahul's performance, Pahalgam attack and upcoming film Kesari Veer

Entertainment"Ajaz Khan's phone switched off, searching for him," says Mumbai Police after FIR lodged against actor

International"Not the time for military confrontation, it can become counterproductive": Former Indian diplomat Manju Seth

National Realted Stories

NationalCPI-M and CM Vijayan upset with KV Thomas over his remarks

NationalAssam CM Sarma 'challenges' Rahul over Cong MP Gogoi's 'Pak links'

NationalReports on FM Sitharaman asking ADB to cut funding for Pakistan ‘untrue’: Centre

NationalNCW takes cognisance of plea by women who lost spouse, son in Murshidabad violence

NationalOdisha Police arrests two from Bengal in Rs 6 crore cyber fraud case