City
Epaper

SC issues notice on PIL challenging gender discriminatory provisions in UP Revenue Code

By IANS | Updated: November 6, 2024 21:25 IST

New Delhi, Nov 6 The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to examine a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 6 The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to examine a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging several provisions of the UP Revenue Code, 2006 on grounds of gender discrimination.

A bench, headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, issued notice, seeking the responses of the Centre and Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments in the matter.

As per the computerised case status, the PIL is likely to be heard next on December 10.

The plea said that Section 109 of the UP Revenue Code suffers from the vice of gender discrimination because when a woman, who has inherited the land as a female, dies, her land stands devolved upon the heirs of her husband, rather than her own heirs. It added that Section 109 provides that when a daughter gets married, she loses her land which she inherited from her father and the land automatically stands devolved upon the nearest surviving heir of the last male holder of the land.

Similarly, if a widow remarries, she stands divested of her land inherited from her deceased husband, which devolves upon the nearest surviving heir of the last male holder of the land, the plea said.

It further referred to Sections 108 and 110 of the UP Revenue Code providing that in the event of the demise of the father or the mother, his/her land is inherited by his unmarried daughter but not by his/her married daughter.

"No distinction for succession has been made between a ‘married son’ and an ‘unmarried son’. But, concerning a daughter, the distinction has been arbitrarily and artificially created between an 'unmarried daughter' and a ‘married daughter’ and, as such, marriage has been made as a rationale for discrimination," the plea said.

It said that the above statutory provisions exhibit blatant gender discrimination and contravene the constitutional guarantee of equality, as they infringe on the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 15. The plea also challenged similar provisions of the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Adoption and Modification Order, 2001) in its application to Uttarakhand.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalBengaluru: Man Arrested for Spreading Hoax ‘Zombie Drug’ Video on Social Media

InternationalIndia-Mauritius healthcare cooperation set to expand further: EAM Jaishankar

Business4.05 lakh PNG connections gasified, LPG deliveries normal: Govt

National4.05 lakh PNG connections gasified, LPG deliveries normal: Govt

InternationalUS lawmakers seek probe into Tax-Exempt groups linked to CCP's united front operations

National Realted Stories

NationalGujarat Police dog 'Check' wins gold, bronze at 69th All India Police Duty Meet after 16 years

NationalKarnataka Home Minister clarifies no 'zombie drugs' exist; police arrest man for posting video

NationalGujarat: BJP MP slams Kanhaiya Kumar over 'infiltrator' remark, calls him 'tukde-tukde gang leader'

NationalIndo-Taiwan industrial park to be developed in Sanand-Dholera

National"His legacy will continue to inspire coming generations": Rajnath Singh expresses grief over passing of Kargil veteran Colonel Sonam Wangchuk