City
Epaper

SC warns of action against untruthful witnesses in criminal trials

By IANS | Updated: October 23, 2025 15:40 IST

New Delhi, Oct 23 The Supreme Court has issued a stern warning to witnesses attempting to mislead trial ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 23 The Supreme Court has issued a stern warning to witnesses attempting to mislead trial proceedings in a criminal case, directing that any such conduct be dealt with strictly by the trial court.

Remarking that the integrity of the judicial process must be preserved, a bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and N.V. Anjaria observed: "If the trial court finds that any witness has tried to take sides in their deposition without being truthful to the court, the court shall take suo motu cognisance of such conduct and initiate action in their individual capacity."

The observation came amid submissions by senior advocate Vipin Sanghi, appearing for the petitioner, that three private prosecution witnesses had turned hostile after the accused/respondent no.2 was released from custody.

Sanghi added that such a development "speaks volumes about the conduct of the respondent".

Although senior advocate Mukta Gupta, appearing for the accused, "strongly denied such allegation", the apex court expressed concern over the possible influence on witnesses.

Stressing the need for fairness, the Justice Amanullah-led Bench also directed that the remaining official witnesses — two doctors and Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) officers — record their evidence "under full police protection, without the witnesses being intimidated or influenced in any manner".

"Keeping in view the fact that now all private individuals, who were prosecution witnesses, have been examined, and only two doctors and the Forensic Science Laboratory(FSL) officers, who are official witnesses, remain to be examined, we direct the learned Senior Advocate for the respondent no.1 (State) to ensure that the remaining witnesses record their evidence under full police protection, without the witnesses being intimidated or influenced in any manner," the apex court said.

It further ordered that its directions be "communicated to the concerned witnesses prior to their deposition".

The matter has been listed for further hearing on December 11.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIsraeli PM holds talks with US State Secy on Trump's Gaza peace plan

CricketICC Women's World Cup 2025 Points Table: Updated Standings After India Women vs New Zealand Women Match

Other SportsWomen's World Cup: Credit to Smriti and Pratika for converting starts, says skipper Harmanpreet as India reach semis

CricketIndia storm into Women's World Cup semi-finals with dominant win over New Zealand

NationalNDA alliance set for decisive win in Bihar polls: Union MoS SP Singh Baghel (IANS interview)

National Realted Stories

NationalTelangana minister Surekha apologises to CM for daughter’s outbursts

NationalK'taka: Diwali traditional fest turns tragic as 3 killed in bull-taming competition

NationalBhopal district administration orders ban on 'carbide gun'

NationalTelangana to issue ordinance to scrap two-child norm for local body polls

NationalOdisha: Awareness drive launched against reel-making on railway tracks