City
Epaper

SC warns of action against untruthful witnesses in criminal trials

By IANS | Updated: October 23, 2025 15:40 IST

New Delhi, Oct 23 The Supreme Court has issued a stern warning to witnesses attempting to mislead trial ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 23 The Supreme Court has issued a stern warning to witnesses attempting to mislead trial proceedings in a criminal case, directing that any such conduct be dealt with strictly by the trial court.

Remarking that the integrity of the judicial process must be preserved, a bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and N.V. Anjaria observed: "If the trial court finds that any witness has tried to take sides in their deposition without being truthful to the court, the court shall take suo motu cognisance of such conduct and initiate action in their individual capacity."

The observation came amid submissions by senior advocate Vipin Sanghi, appearing for the petitioner, that three private prosecution witnesses had turned hostile after the accused/respondent no.2 was released from custody.

Sanghi added that such a development "speaks volumes about the conduct of the respondent".

Although senior advocate Mukta Gupta, appearing for the accused, "strongly denied such allegation", the apex court expressed concern over the possible influence on witnesses.

Stressing the need for fairness, the Justice Amanullah-led Bench also directed that the remaining official witnesses — two doctors and Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) officers — record their evidence "under full police protection, without the witnesses being intimidated or influenced in any manner".

"Keeping in view the fact that now all private individuals, who were prosecution witnesses, have been examined, and only two doctors and the Forensic Science Laboratory(FSL) officers, who are official witnesses, remain to be examined, we direct the learned Senior Advocate for the respondent no.1 (State) to ensure that the remaining witnesses record their evidence under full police protection, without the witnesses being intimidated or influenced in any manner," the apex court said.

It further ordered that its directions be "communicated to the concerned witnesses prior to their deposition".

The matter has been listed for further hearing on December 11.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Football"There's a great atmosphere of joy": Satadru Dutta ahead of Lionel Messi's arrival in Kolkata

Other Sports"I thank the Central and state governments": Surrendered Naxalite player Veti Ganga after participating in Bastar Olympics

InternationalThailand, Cambodia agree to renew ceasefire after deadly border clashes, says Trump

Tennis"Pleased to see...": Leander Paes on local communities supporting Tennis Premier League

CricketICC and JioStar clarify stance on media rights after exit rumours

National Realted Stories

NationalCotton mop left in patient's abdominal cavity: Delhi HC quashes FIR against hospital, senior doctor after settlement

National10-year jail term for hate speech reflects Congress' cruel tradition: Union Minister Joshi

NationalLow inflation is a positive signal for economic growth, say experts

NationalRBI announces second tranche of OMO buys valued at Rs 50,000 crore

NationalECoR deploys solar-powered CCTVs, drones to boost safety of passengers, railway properties