City
Epaper

Supreme Court to Review SBI's Plea for Extended Disclosure Time on Electoral Bonds on March 11

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: March 8, 2024 16:22 IST

A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider an application filed by the State Bank ...

Open in App

A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court is scheduled to consider an application filed by the State Bank of India (SBI) on March 11. The application seeks an extension of time until June 30 to disclose specifics of each electoral bond cashed by political parties. 

Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud leads the bench, which will also address a separate plea. This plea alleges contempt against the SBI, accusing it of deliberately disobeying the Supreme Court's directive to submit details of political party contributions via electoral bonds to the Election Commission by March 6.

In a landmark verdict delivered on February 15, a five-judge constitution bench had scrapped the Centre's electoral bonds scheme of anonymous political funding, calling it unconstitutional and ordering disclosure by the Election Commission of the donors, the amount donated by them and the recipients by March 13.

Following an order to immediately cease the electoral bond scheme, the Supreme Court instructed the State Bank of India (SBI), the authorized financial entity overseeing the scheme, to furnish details of electoral bonds purchased since April 12, 2019, by March 6. These details were to be submitted to the Election Commission, which was further directed to publish the information on its official website by March 13.

On March 4, the SBI petitioned the Supreme Court for an extension until June 30 to disclose the particulars of electoral bonds cashed by political parties. The SBI argued that retrieving information from various sources and cross-referencing it would be a time-consuming process, citing the need to sift through multiple data "silos."

Tags: Supreme CourtState Bank Of IndiaElectoral bonds
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalRJD cries foul even as ECI data shows robust participation in Bihar’s voter verification drive

NationalKU students must be employed to build a greater future for India: J&K L-G

NationalDelhi CM slams AAP leaders for spreading rumours on slum demolitions

NationalIndia's direct tax collections double as incomes rise, compliance grows

NationalPM Modi to inaugurate Bhopal Metro’s priority corridor in Oct: CM Mohan Yadav