City
Epaper

SC to hear all pleas against IBC's personal insolvency provisions

By IANS | Updated: October 29, 2020 20:37 IST

New Delhi, Oct 29 The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the transfer, to itself, of all petitions pending before ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 29 The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the transfer, to itself, of all petitions pending before various High Courts against the provisions of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) with regard to personal insolvency.

A bench comprising Justices L. Nageswara Rao, Hemant Gupta and Ajay Rastogi passed the order on the petition of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India under Article 139 (A) read with Article 142 of the Constitution, seeking transfer of the writ petitions filed before High Courts to the apex court.

"The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is at a nascent stage and it is better that the interpretation of the provisions of the Code is taken up by this court to avoid any confusion, and to authoritatively settle the law," the bench said.

By a notification dated November 15, 2019, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, in exercise of its power conferred under Section 1(3) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 brought into force the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 insofar as they related to 'personal guarantors to corporate debtors' with effect from December 1, 2019.

Writ petitions were filed in the Delhi High Court and other High Courts challenging this notification and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process of Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019.

"The writ petitioners also sought a declaration that Section 95, 96, 99, 100, 101 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 are unconstitutional insofar as they apply to personal guarantors of corporate debtors," observed the top court.

Additional Solicitor General Madhavi Divan, appearing for the IBBI, submitted that in view of the importance of the matter, it is imminent that all the writ petitions should be transferred to the top court for an early resolution of the dispute.

"The Additional Solicitor General submitted that different opinions by the High Courts before which the Writ Petitions are pending would lead to confusion," the top court said.

The IBBI insisted that the best course would be to transfer the cases to the top court where the dispute can be finally resolved.

The top court said: "After hearing the submissions made by the parties, we are of the considered opinion that the writ petitions that are pending in the High Courts pertaining to the challenge to the Notification dated November 15, 2019 and related issues have to be transferred to this Court."

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalPakistan: 3 killed, 7 injured in bus firing in Balochistan's Kalat

Entertainment'Harry Potter' star Emma Watson banned from driving after breaking speed limit

International"Very close to a deal with India...we're in negotiation: US President Trump

FootballIndia U20 women thrash Uzbekistan 4-1

BusinessNifty 50 may touch new record high of 28,957 by December if bull run returns: Report

Business Realted Stories

BusinessGovt emphasises ULI as critical DPI for lending ecosystem

BusinessReal estate firm Kalpataru clocks 42 pc decline in net profit in Q4 FY25

BusinessAngel One’s net profit falls 34 pc sequentially to Rs 114 crore in Q1

BusinessUIDAI accesses 1.55 crore death records to deactivate Aadhaar numbers of deceased

Business"We remain deeply committed to partnering in this national mission": Mahindra Group CEO on PM Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana