City
Epaper

No 'attraction' for Goa: Tushar Mehta quips in HC

By IANS | Published: August 10, 2021 2:00 PM

Panaji, Aug 10 High on the bucket-lists of domestic tourists as a go-to destination, Goa bodes no "attraction" ...

Open in App

Panaji, Aug 10 High on the bucket-lists of domestic tourists as a go-to destination, Goa bodes no "attraction" for Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, one of the government's top law officers.

Mehta made the disclosure in lighter vein to the Bombay High Court, during a discussion for setting up of a fresh date for the ongoing hearings related to an appeal filed by the Goa government, against the acquittal of former Tehelka editor-in-chief Tarun Tejpal by a trial court in May this year.

While Mehta was seeking to appear before a virtual hearing of the case, Justice Sunil Deshmukh, suggested that the Bombay High Court may be opting for physical hearings in the near future and urged Mehta to visit Goa instead.

"I would definitely like to. But as a tourist, not... I am not busy. First of all, just on the lighter side. Coming from Gujarat I have no attraction in Goa," Mehta said.

"In Gujarat, we are teetotallers and vegetar. Second, I would still like to come to Goa but as a tourist not for work," Mehta also said.

Responding to Mehta's quip, Justice Mahesh Sonak said: "We have legal tourism here".

Mehta's adversary in the Tejpal case, senior advocate Amit Desai, who was also present during the virtual hearing, while responding to Mehta's reluctance to visit Goa, also said: "Mr. Mehta should know that many of his Delhi colleagues have houses in Goa".

The hearing in the case, related to the Goa government's appeal in the rape case, will now be held virtually on August 31.

Tejpal was charged against under sections 376 (rape), 341 (wrongful restraint), 342 (wrongful confinement) 354A (sexual harassment) and 354B (criminal assault), of the Indian Penal Code, after a junior colleague accused him of rape at a five star resort in Goa in 2013.

On May 21, he was acquitted by the trial court in Goa citing "benefit of doubt", following which an appeal was filed by the state government.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Solicitor General of IndiaBombay High CourtTarun TejpalJustice of bombay high courtBombay highSunil deshmukh
Open in App

Related Stories

NagpurHigh Court Reserves Order on Congress Leader Rashmi Barve's Caste Validity Certificate Revocation Petition

MaharashtraBombay HC Dismisses Petitions Objecting Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Rename Aurangabad and Osmanabad

NationalBombay HC Grants Interim Bail to Jet Airways Founder Naresh Goyal in Money Laundering Case

MaharashtraMaratha Reservation Row: OBC Welfare Foundation Moves HC Against Kunbi Certificates Given to Maratha Community

MaharashtraMumbai: HC Orders Railway Ministry to Deposit Rs 3.9 Crore Within a Month or Face Confiscation of Churchgate Building

International Realted Stories

InternationalPeople not demanding a life of comfort, but are struggling to survive: UKPNP leader

InternationalNepali Congress vows to disrupt parliament until probe into fraud allegations involving Home Minister

InternationalUAE strongly condemns Israeli settler attacks on Jordanian aid convoy enroute to Gaza Strip

InternationalFujairah CP briefed about work of 'Ministry of Human Resources and Emiratisation Fujairah Labour Office'

InternationalUAE, Iran hold 10th meeting of Joint Consular Committee