City
Epaper

Pak minister claims Imran Khan ready to provide proof of 'foreign-funded conspiracy' to topple PTI govt

By ANI | Updated: March 29, 2022 22:00 IST

After Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan alleged that some people are trying to topple his government with the help of foreign funds, federal minister Asad Umar claimed that the PM is ready to show a letter to Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial to back his claims.

Open in App

After Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan alleged that some people are trying to topple his government with the help of foreign funds, federal minister Asad Umar claimed that the PM is ready to show a letter to Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial to back his claims.

While addressing a press conference in Islamabad, alongside Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry, Minister for Planning and Development Umar said he had seen the letter himself, reported Dawn.

"Obviously, it is the highest office of justice in Pakistan, it is a huge position that has respect in this country. Personally too, the chief justice has a very good reputation. The prime minister said that [...], if necessary, and for the people's satisfaction, he is ready to present the letter to the chief justice of the Supreme Court," he added.

However, at the same time, the information Minister said that the letter is not sent to the judge with the aim to get the letter reviewed. The letter would not be shared with him in the capacity of a judge of the SC, but as someone who held a high and respectable position in the country, he added.

Umar further said the letter stated that if Imran Khan remained the prime minister, it would lead to "horrific consequences". Moreover, the minister said, the contents of the letter termed the ouster of PM Imran a "good result".

He added that the "threat" PM Imran spoke about in relevance to the letter during his March 27 address "is directly linked to the no-confidence motion".

PM Imran had said during his rally, "Attempts are being made through foreign money to change the government in Pakistan. Our people are being used. Mostly inadvertently, but some people are using money against us. We know from what places attempts are being to pressure us. We have been threatened in writing but we will not compromise on national interest."

After the no-confidence motion against Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan was tabled in the National Assembly with a total of 161 votes in favour, the proceedings were adjourned till March 31.

The no-confidence motion was submitted by the Opposition parties on March 8. The Opposition has been confident that its motion would be carried as many PTI lawmakers have come out in the open against PM Imran Khan.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: pakistanislamabadImran KhanSupreme CourtCJPImran ahmadAsad umarDhs punjabNational assembly standing committee on financeJitender singh mehta
Open in App

Related Stories

CricketWhy Is ICC Hosting Women’s ODI World Cup 2025 in Navi Mumbai Instead of Bengaluru? DY Patil to Host 5 Matches

National'Release of Sterilised Stray Dogs, Aggressive Ones to Remain in Cages': Supreme Court

NationalNo Toll Collection on Bad or Congested Roads: Supreme Court

EntertainmentNatashaa Fernandes on SC Order on Stray Dogs: Will It Solve the Problem or Create a New Crisis?

NationalCentre Opposes Lowering Age of Consent to 16 Under POCSO, Says Move Could Harm Minors

International Realted Stories

International"India must take Trump's point over Russian oil seriously," Nikki Haley on US tarrifs

InternationalPlight of Pakistan's Buddhists and crumbling state of their heritage tell story of abandonment, marginalisation: Report

InternationalZelensky playing a 'game' over call to meet Putin, EU prolonging conflict: Lavrov

InternationalIndia will buy oil from wherever it gets "best deal": Indian envoy slams US tariffs as "unfair, unjustified"

InternationalBangladesh: Politics of extortion and the death of democracy (IANS Analysis)