City
Epaper

US-Taliban peace talks stuck over definition of violence

By IANS | Updated: January 26, 2020 19:00 IST

The negotiations for an Afghanistan peace deal between the US and the Taliban are ensnarled over their disagreement on the definition of "reduction in violence".

Open in App

A few weeks ago, the US and Taliban representatives resumed the stalled negotiations, which President Donald Trump had called off in September last year. The two sides have been holding closed-door parleys in Qatar to finalize the peace deal and gradual withdrawal of the US and NATO forces which launched a war against terror in Afghanistan 18 years ago.

Top officials told that Washington has been feeling frustrated that even as the Taliban had offered to reduce attacks for up to ten days during the drawdown of the US forces from Afghanistan, violence remained high.

As per the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP) data, 54 civil, 32 security forces and 232 militants have been killed since the beginning of this year alone. Last year, 817 civil, 728 security forces and 10634 militants were killed in the country.

"The deal is continually running into the bottleneck of defining "reduction in violence". Both the sides have a different measure for it," an official source said. "Due to the high level of violence while the negotiations are on, there is tremendous distrust in each other," he added.

While the US has been demanding a considerable drop in militant violence against the forces before signing a deal, the Taliban have been arguing that a longer and wider ceasefire with the security forces can only be part of the intra-Afghan negotiations over power-sharing at a later stage.

"The Taliban, which has refused to hold direct talks with the Afghanistan government, don't want to give up their leverage, which essentially comes from violence," said a Pashtun source near the Durand Line, that separates Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Taliban's offer of limited reduction in violence, given to the US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, didn't draw any support from the Afghanistan government either. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has rejected their offer arguing that his government would participate in negotiations with Taliban over power-sharing only once a substantial ceasefire was in place.

Interestingly, the Taliban on Tuesday ruled out the possibility of a nationwide ceasefire until the US signed the deal on the troop withdrawal.

The US has around 11,000 troops in Afghanistan and has been gradually withdrawing forces even though the two sides have not signed a deal yet. The Trump administration intends to draw down another 4,000 troops before they sign a peace pact with the Taliban.

Accusing the US of "wasting time", the Taliban on Thursday, said the talks with Zalmay Khalilzad were stuck over a definition of "reduction of violence."

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: TalibanusAfghanistanDonald TrumpZalmay Khalilzad
Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalDOGE Must Audit Elon Musk's Firms, Says Donald Trump in Explosive Post

OpinionsBeing Sold Repeatedly is Pak’s Destiny!

International"I Ended That With a Series of Phone Calls on Trade”: Donald Trump Repeats Claim of Averting India-Pakistan War (VIDEO)

InternationalSouth Carolina: 20 Injured in Lightning Strike at Lake Murray Public Park in Lexington

InternationalIran Says No Intention to Continue If Israel Stops, After Donald Trump Says Ceasefire Agreed

International Realted Stories

International"Will have to cross that bridge when we come to it": Jaishankar on Lindsey Graham's Russian sanctions bill

InternationalArmy chief lauds Indian military team for 'focused' joint training in Bhutan

InternationalRecognition of his steadfast efforts in strengthening voice of Global South: Jaishankar as PM Modi receives Ghana's highest state honour

International3 indians abducted from factory amid al-Qaeda linked terrorist attack; India urges Mali to secure their safe, swift release

InternationalTaiwan detects heightened Chinese incursions around strait