Bombay HC dismisses plea of Godrej & Boyce against land acquisition

By Lokmat English Desk | Published: February 9, 2023 02:16 PM2023-02-09T14:16:15+5:302023-02-09T14:16:24+5:30

The Bombay High Court said the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project is of national importance and in public interest, and ...

Bombay HC dismisses plea of Godrej & Boyce against land acquisition | Bombay HC dismisses plea of Godrej & Boyce against land acquisition

Bombay HC dismisses plea of Godrej & Boyce against land acquisition

The Bombay High Court said the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project is of national importance and in public interest, and dismissed a petition filed by Godrej & Boyce company challenging acquisition proceedings initiated by the Maharashtra government and the NHSRCL in Mumbai's Vikhroli area for the project.

A division bench of Justices R D Dhanuka and M M Sathaye said the project was one-of-its-kind and collective interest would prevail over private interest.

Of the total 508.17 kilometres of rail track between Mumbai and Ahmedabad, about 21 km is planned to be underground. One of the entry points to the underground tunnel falls on the land in Vikhroli (owned by Godrej).

The state government and the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) had claimed the company was delaying the entire project which was of public importance.

The authorities had told the HC that the acquisition process of the entire line for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train project was complete except the land owned by Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited in Vikhroli area.

The state government had earlier informed the court that it has already deposited the Rs 264 crore compensation amount awarded to the company in October last year.

The Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co Ltd had filed a petition challenging an order of September 15, 2022 passed by the Maharashtra government awarding compensation to it for land acquisition for the bullet train project.

The project is of national importance and in public interest. We have not found any illegality in the compensation. It is the paramount collective interest that would prevail and not private interest, the court said.

The company has not made out a case for the court to exercise its powers and hence no interference is required, it added.

Open in app