City
Epaper

2002 riots: Gujarat govt withdraws security cover of judge, witnesses, and lawyers

By Lokmat English Desk | Published: December 29, 2023 9:14 AM

Fifteen years after a SC-appointed SIT formed a witness protection cell for the complainants/witnesses of the 2002 riots, Gujarat ...

Open in App

Fifteen years after a SC-appointed SIT formed a witness protection cell for the complainants/witnesses of the 2002 riots, Gujarat government has withdrawn police cover from the witnesses, their lawyers, and also a retired judge. Among those who have lost police protection is former principal city sessions judge Jyotsna Yagnik, who had convicted 32 of the accused in Naroda Patia case involving the massacre of 97 people. She had two layers of security assigned to her after she purportedly received threats on 18 occasions. A posse of guards would be deployed at Yagnik’s house while a personal security officer would always be her shadow. In November, the guards deployed at her house were removed allegedly without informing her. Yagnik contemplated writing to the CJI about it but had second thoughts about it. Imtiyazkhan Pathan, the prime witness in the Gulbarg Society massacre, said, “If something happens to us, who will be responsible? court, SIT, or police? We should be given arms licences for our protection if police protection is removed.” Pathan said it was “improper” of SIT to withdraw police protection when most of the cases were pending in the courts and the majority of the accused were out on bail. Iqbal Baloch, a witness in the Dipda Darwaza case, termed police stations being instructed to watch over him and the others “meaningless”. The decision to revoke police protection of witnesses came on December 13, seemingly catching them by surprise. Officials said Gujarat Police withdrew all personnel deployed for protection of the witnesses, lawyers and a judge on a recommendation by SIT chief B C Solanki.“

After assessment, a decision has been taken to withdraw the protection...It is requested to instruct respective police station in-charge to take care of the security of witnesses,” states the letter. The Ahmedabad police has since sought details of the witnesses, complainants and lawyers whose security cover has been withdrawn. The 2002 Gujarat riots, also known as the 2002 Gujarat violence, was a three-day period of inter-communal violence in the western Indian state of Gujarat. The burning of a train in Godhra on 27 February 2002, which caused the deaths of 58 Hindu pilgrims and karsevaks returning from Ayodhya, is cited as having instigated the violence. Following the initial riot incidents, there were further outbreaks of violence in Ahmedabad for three months; statewide, there were further outbreaks of violence against the minority Muslim population of Gujarat for the next year.

Tags: Gujarat RiotsGujarat GovernmentSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Centre on Plea Challenging Marital Rape Exception in New Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita

NationalWife Accuses Husband of Rape for Taking Her to Afghanistan; Supreme Court Stays Proceedings

NationalSupreme Court Rejects ED Objection Over Arvind Kejriwal’s ‘Vote for AAP or Will To Go Jail on June 2’ Comment

NationalMukhtar Ansari Prayer Meet: SC Grants Abbas Ansari Permission To Attend Private Ceremony With Family

National'Arrest and Remand Illegal': Supreme Court Orders Release of NewsClick Founder Prabir Purkayastha in UAPA Case

National Realted Stories

NationalScorching heatwaves: Rajasthan's Barmer, UP's Kanpur hottest at 46.9 deg C

NationalAnjali murder case: DCP suspended for 'negligence'; victim's sister attempts suicide

NationalSahara India hits out at makers of 'Scam' series

NationalNow Nagaland poll panel urges Naga body not to abstain from local body polls

NationalAssam: Woman arrested for killing husband & burning his body