City
Epaper

Article 370 was necessary step, but statehood still pending: Aditya Thackeray

By IANS | Updated: August 5, 2025 20:19 IST

Mumbai, Aug 5 As India observes the sixth anniversary of the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation ...

Open in App

Mumbai, Aug 5 As India observes the sixth anniversary of the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories, Shiv Sena-UBT leader and MLA Aditya Thackeray on Tuesday said that while the removal of the constitutional provision was a necessary and proud step, the promised restoration of statehood remains unfulfilled.

"Removing Article 370 was a necessary step, and we are proud of it. But the statehood that was to be granted after this has not yet been fulfilled. The security situation remains concerning—there is still no clear answer as to who was behind the recent terrorist activities in Pahalgam," Thackeray, the son of SS-UBT chief Uddhav Thackeray, said.

Thackeray's remarks came as political leaders across the spectrum reflected on the impact of the decision taken in 2019, which significantly altered Jammu and Kashmir’s constitutional and administrative status.

Reacting to US President Donald Trump’s latest comments threatening “substantially higher tariffs” on India over its continued oil trade with Russia, Thackeray expressed concern over the Indian government’s silence.

"The most important thing is that no Union Minister has responded to this yet. India appears helpless on the global stage. We must respond firmly. The Commerce Ministry should make a public statement, because this issue directly affects trade and, in turn, impacts the common citizen," he added.

Taking a jibe at the friendship between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump, he added: "Trump and PM Modi were once hailed as best friends. But that so-called friendship is now nowhere to be seen."

Commenting on the fifth anniversary of the Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan, Thackeray said, “Prominent saints like Shankaracharya were not even invited to the inauguration. The temple wasn’t fully ready at the time—it became more of an election issue than a religious milestone. We had already said earlier—for them, its \First temple, then government'."

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Other SportsPKL 12: Sandeep masterclass helps U Mumba complete double over Tamil Thalaivas, move to fifth spot

EntertainmentHrithik Roshan joins in the star-studded Durga Puja celebration with Alia, Karan & Rani

National‘Deep insult to freedom struggle’: Congress on honouring RSS

CricketIND vs WI, 1st Test: Will Rain Play Spoilsport in India vs West Indies Match in Ahmedabad? Check Pitch Report and Weather Forecast

Other SportsWomen’s World Cup: Wanted to score off as many balls as possible, says Gardner

National Realted Stories

NationalBody of Howrah-based businessman recovered from Hooghly district in Bengal

NationalDotasra remarks against RSS and BJP are inappropriate: Rajasthan Minister

NationalFarmer suicides rising again in Telangana, says KTR

NationalKerala: Student Unions express aghast over new KU circular regarding admissions norms

NationalKharge undergoes successful pacemaker surgery, to resume work Oct 3