City
Epaper

Bengal police face Calcutta HC’s ire over 'lackadaisical' statement recording in 'mystery' death case

By IANS | Updated: February 6, 2024 22:00 IST

Kolkata, Feb 6 The West Bengal Police on Tuesday faced the ire of the Calcutta High Court over ...

Open in App

Kolkata, Feb 6 The West Bengal Police on Tuesday faced the ire of the Calcutta High Court over the alleged lackadaisical statement recording in a mystery death case of a local BJP leader in the South 24 Parganas district of the state.

While hearing the matter, the single-judge bench of Justice Jay Sengupta also observed that if the state police are unable to carry out the investigation in a transparent and reliable manner, the probe may be handed over to a different investigating agency.

Justice Sengupta also took exception as to why the investigating officers did not do video recording of the statement of a doctor, who is a witness in the case, saying it is not clear why the video recording was not done.

After the panchayat elections in the state last year, BJP candidate Bholanath Mondal had died under mysterious circumstances while he was under treatment at a hospital in Diamond Harbour in South 24 Parganas district.

His family members alleged that the cause of death was physical assault by the ruling Trinamool Congress workers on the election day, following which he had to be hospitalised. However, the post-mortem report put the cause of death as lever-related ailments.

The family members of Mondal had then approached the Calcutta High Court challenging the content of the autopsy report.

Their counsel alleged that the police had put pressure on the witnesses and the doctor to give statements in a particular manner and that is why no video recording of the statements were made.

The family members also accused the police of putting the witnesses under pressure by unnecessarily sending notices to them.

However, on Tuesday, the state government counsel argued that the death of a person because of medical complications is unnecessarily being politicised.

The matter will be heard next on March 13. Before that, the petitioners should file their points of argument in the form of an affidavit and submit to the court, Justice Sengupta directed.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Other Sports‘When it happens, we can talk about it’: Glasner on Palace’s hunt for maiden major trophy

InternationalBangladeshi women's rights activists rally against anti-feminist wave

EntertainmentJustin Bieber not among 'Diddy' victims, there are individuals who were genuinely harmed, says singer's spokesperson

NationalKejriwal vows to take war against drugs at street level in Punjab

BusinessChoosing the Right ULIP Plan: Factors You Must Consider

National Realted Stories

NationalShiv Sena-UBT welcomes move to send multi-party MP delegations abroad to expose Pakistan’s role in Pahalgam attack

NationalKerala: Customs Seize Rs 44 Lakh Foreign Currency from Woman at Nedumbassery Airport

NationalThe journey that began on May 16, 2014: India under PM Modi

NationalNirav Modi refused bail fourth time by UK HC due to quantum of scam: ED

NationalIndia in no hurry to review suspension of Indus Waters Treaty: MoJS