City
Epaper

Bhushan cites 2018 press meet, SC hopes its last time judges go to press

By IANS | Updated: August 31, 2020 16:35 IST

New Delhi, Aug 31 As advocate Prashant Bhushan, defending his expression of opinion through tweets, cited the press ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 31 As advocate Prashant Bhushan, defending his expression of opinion through tweets, cited the press conference held by sitting apex court judges in January 2018, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed his argument, saying it is settled that negative equality cannot be claimed as there is no such concept.

A bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai and Krishna Murari said: "We hope it was the first and the last occasion that the judges have gone to press, and god gives wisdom to protect its dignity by an internal mechanism, particularly, when allegations made, if any, publicly cannot be met by sufferer judges. It would cause suffering to them till eternity."

The apex court said Bhushan tried to justify the averments he made on the basis of the press conference held by the four senior-most judges of the court.

"Concept of equality before law... what is permissible, not as to what is impermissible. It is settled that negative equality cannot be claimed as there is no concept of negative equality," said the bench.

The top court said truth can be a defence to the judges also, but they are bound by judicial norms, ethics, and code of conduct. "Similarly, the code of conduct for advocates is equally applicable to the lawyers also, being part of the system. The Rules of Professional Ethics formed by the Bar Council, though couched under statutory powers, are themselves not enough to prescribe or proscribe the nobility of profession in entirety. The nobility of profession encompasses, over and above, the Rules of Ethics," observed the top court.

The bench said that fair criticism is based on the authentic and acceptable material permissible, but when criticism tends to create apprehension in the minds of the people regarding integrity, ability and fairness of the judge, it amounts to contempt. "Such criticism is not protected under Article 19

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Arun MishraPrashant BhushanBar CouncilSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

MumbaiMumbai: Retired Bank Manager, Family Held in ‘Digital Arrest’ for 35 Days; ₹1.83 Crore Lost to Cyber Fraud in Mulund

InternationalDonald Trump's Global Tariffs Illegal : US Supreme Court Deals Major Blow to President

EntertainmentNeeraj Pandey Drops ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ Title; Supreme Court Closes Case

InternationalRamadan 2026 Moon Sighting in Saudi Arabia: Supreme Court of KSA Calls on Muslims to Search for Crescent on THIS Date

National Realted Stories

NationalFinal preparations underway for Assam, Kerala Assembly polls

NationalSobha Surendran rejects cash-for-vote charge; alleges conspiracy to tarnish image

NationalEPS calls DMK a ‘failure model’, targets Stalin govt over jobs, flooding

National'Situation ambiguous', 'Iran came out stronger': Former Ambassador to China on US-Iran ceasefire

NationalUP's Chitrakoot defence node gains momentum, BEL to set up manufacturing unit