City
Epaper

Bhushan cites 2018 press meet, SC hopes its last time judges go to press

By IANS | Updated: August 31, 2020 16:35 IST

New Delhi, Aug 31 As advocate Prashant Bhushan, defending his expression of opinion through tweets, cited the press ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 31 As advocate Prashant Bhushan, defending his expression of opinion through tweets, cited the press conference held by sitting apex court judges in January 2018, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed his argument, saying it is settled that negative equality cannot be claimed as there is no such concept.

A bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai and Krishna Murari said: "We hope it was the first and the last occasion that the judges have gone to press, and god gives wisdom to protect its dignity by an internal mechanism, particularly, when allegations made, if any, publicly cannot be met by sufferer judges. It would cause suffering to them till eternity."

The apex court said Bhushan tried to justify the averments he made on the basis of the press conference held by the four senior-most judges of the court.

"Concept of equality before law... what is permissible, not as to what is impermissible. It is settled that negative equality cannot be claimed as there is no concept of negative equality," said the bench.

The top court said truth can be a defence to the judges also, but they are bound by judicial norms, ethics, and code of conduct. "Similarly, the code of conduct for advocates is equally applicable to the lawyers also, being part of the system. The Rules of Professional Ethics formed by the Bar Council, though couched under statutory powers, are themselves not enough to prescribe or proscribe the nobility of profession in entirety. The nobility of profession encompasses, over and above, the Rules of Ethics," observed the top court.

The bench said that fair criticism is based on the authentic and acceptable material permissible, but when criticism tends to create apprehension in the minds of the people regarding integrity, ability and fairness of the judge, it amounts to contempt. "Such criticism is not protected under Article 19

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Arun MishraPrashant BhushanBar CouncilSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Polls 2025: Supreme Court Asks State Commission to Conduct Elections Within 4 Months

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

MumbaiBadlapur Encounter Case: Supreme Court Stays FIR Against Thane Police in Akshay Shinde Death

National Realted Stories

NationalAkhilesh Yadav Reaffirms Samajwadi Party's Stand to Support Government in Action Against Terrorism

National'Operation Sindoor' a 'befitting response' to Pahalgam terror attack, says Tripura CM

NationalOp Sindoor: All steps taken to ensure civilian safety; teams deployed at key installations, says K'taka HM

NationalVIP Chief Sahani backs Operation Sindoor, calls it befitting reply to terrorism

NationalPrashant Kishor backs 'Operation Sindoor'; urges nation to avoid politics over military action