City
Epaper

Constant taunts over financial limitations grounds for divorce: Delhi HC

By IANS | Updated: February 3, 2024 19:55 IST

New Delhi, Feb 3 The Delhi High Court has said that continuous taunts by a wife regarding her ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 3 The Delhi High Court has said that continuous taunts by a wife regarding her husband's financial capacity and pressuring him to fulfill extravagant dreams beyond his means amount to mental cruelty, justifying a divorce.

The division bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna said that a spouse should not be a constant reminder of financial limitations, and unreasonable demands can create persistent dissatisfaction, leading to mental strain.

The court was dealing with a wife's appeal, which the bench rejected, challenging a family court order granting divorce to husband on grounds of cruelty.

The family court considered the husband's plea, stating that the wife's actions, including forcing him to move, taunting him for taking a loan, and refusing to adjust to limited resources, constituted mental cruelty.

The court observed: "Pressurising a spouse to fulfill distant and whimsical dreams clearly not within his financial reach may create a sense of persistent dissatisfaction, which would be sufficient mental strain to drain the contentment and tranquillity out of any married life."

Noting the impact of constant bickering and fights on mental well-being, the court noted that seemingly insignificant incidents, when prevailing over time, can create mental stress, making it impossible for the parties to sustain their matrimonial relationship.

The court referred to Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, stating that the relief under this section, allowing divorce for non-compliance of a decree of restitution of conjugal rights, is an absolute right for either party.

The court rejected the argument that only the party in whose favour the restitution was allowed could seek divorce, stating that the language of the section indicates that either party can avail the remedy in case of non-compliance.

The bench upheld the family court's conclusion, stressing the husband's mental strain and the absence of restitution of conjugal rights despite a court decree.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Cricket"The idea was to back each other up every time we're bowling": Prasidh Krishna on team spirit in pace attack

NationalDelhi court issues notice to Robert Vadra in money laundering case; next hearing on Aug 28

BusinessYatra Celebrates 19 Years with The Yatra Big Outing Fest

BusinessHouse of McDowell's Soda Yaari Jam, India's Biggest Branded Live IP, Touches down in Kolkata

BusinessRBI may announce 25 bps rate cut in August to boost credit growth ahead of Diwali: SBI Report

National Realted Stories

NationalWhy not talk to Pakistan if dialogue with China is possible, asks Mani Shankar Aiyar

NationalNHRC seeks action taken report on caste-derogatory village, locality names across India

NationalChennai corporation to revamp two flyover spaces for parking, pedestrian use

NationalJammu and Kashmir Bridge Collapse: Under-Construction Footbridge Linking Udhampur’s Swena and Narsoo Blocks Collapses

NationalCM Stalin to launch 'Nalam Kaakkum Stalin' today