City
Epaper

Delhi HC issues guidelines for sale of refurbished hard disk drives

By IANS | Updated: May 23, 2024 11:25 IST

New Delhi, May 23 The Delhi High Court has issued directions regarding the sale of used and refurbished ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 23 The Delhi High Court has issued directions regarding the sale of used and refurbished Hard Disk Drives (HDDs) to ensure transparency and prevent consumer deception.

This ruling came in response to lawsuits filed by Seagate Technology LLC and Western Digital Technologies Inc against various entities selling refurbished HDDs under different brand names.

Justice Anish Dayal mandated that the packaging of refurbished HDDs must prominently display the name of the original manufacturer in a manner that avoids misleading consumers into thinking they are purchasing a new product.

The court specified that references to the original manufacturers should use word marks like "Seagate" or "WD" and explicitly prohibited the use of original logos to prevent consumer confusion.

Additionally, the court directed that sellers must clearly state that these refurbished products do not come with any manufacturer’s warranty or service.

This information must be included in promotional materials, websites, e-commerce listings, brochures, and manuals related to the refurbished HDDs.

The defendants in the case, including Daichi International, Consistent Infosystems Pvt Ltd, Geonix International Pvt Ltd, and Cubicor Information Systems Pvt Ltd, were accused of refurbishing end-of-life HDDs, repackaging them, and selling them under their brand names with extended warranties.

Seagate and Western Digital argued that this practice constituted an impairment of their products, violating Sections 30(3) and 30(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. However, the court observed that Seagate and Western Digital failed to demonstrate any specific rule, regulation, or policy prohibiting the import of discarded HDDs into India.

Justice Dayal concluded that as long as refurbishers fully disclose that the original marks have been altered or removed and that the product does not resemble the original, consumers are adequately informed about what they are purchasing.

The court thus disposed of the interim relief application filed by Seagate and Western Digital, saying that full disclosure by refurbishers would ensure consumer awareness and protect against deception.

--IANS

spr/dan

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

International"Reckless threats will not affect offensive Ops, nor erase humiliation of US": Iran hits back at Trump

InternationalArtemis II crew begins seven hour flyby of Moon, observes far-side parts never seen by Humans

NationalMadhya Pradesh: Three-storey building collapses in Ujjain's Dhaba road, no injuries reported

International"Degree of reluctance to deploy ground troops": Former senior diplomat on Iran war

PoliticsTelangana CM Revanth Reddy performs Bhoomi Pooja for Basara temple expansion

National Realted Stories

NationalDelhi police arrest 19-yr-old for stabbing man to death

National"LDF and UDF destroyed Keralam": Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan ahead of assembly polls

NationalDwarka Accident case: Mother of deceased victim withdraws plea for CBI probe after Delhi Police assured cooperation

NationalAir India chief executive officer Campbell Wilson steps down: Sources

NationalTurkman Gate stone pelting: Court denies anticipatory bail to accused of leading mob