City
Epaper

Delhi HC transfers plea seeking uniform marriage age for men, women to Supreme Court

By ANI | Updated: January 31, 2023 20:45 IST

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday informed the petitioner that on January 13, 2023, the Supreme Court allowed transferring ...

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday informed the petitioner that on January 13, 2023, the Supreme Court allowed transferring the main proceedings pertaining to uniformity in the minimum age of marriage for men and women in diverse legislations.

The bench of Justice Satish Chander Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad after noted the submissions, directed its registry department to transfer the case related documents immediately to the Supreme Court.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday will hear the public interest litigation (PIL) seeking to equalise of the legal age of marriage for men and women saying the limit of 18 years for a woman, while it is 21 for a man, amounts to discrimination.

The plea before the Delhi High Court earlier stated that at present, while men in India are permitted to get married at the age of 21, women are allowed to get married when they are 18. It is mentioned that more than 125 countries in the world have a uniform age of marriage.

The litigant / Advocate Ashwini Kunar Upadhyay said the plea is filed in the public interest under Article 226 and it challenges a blatant and ongoing form of discrimination against women.

"The discriminatory 'minimum age' limit for marriage for men and women is based in patriarchal stereotypes, has no scientific backing, perpetrates de jure and de facto inequality against women, and goes completely against the global trends," the plea said. As per the petition, some of the statutory provisions, which are responsible for discriminatory 'minimum age' limit for marriage include -- Section 60(1) of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872; Section 3(1)(c) of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936; Section 4(c) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954; Section 5(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Section 2(a) of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006.

The plea stated that the differential bar discriminates against women and contravenes with the fundamental principles of gender equality, gender justice and dignity of women and breaches Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. The petitioner in his petition further stressed that women have a fundamental right to be free to pursue studies or occupations after finishing school at the age of 18.

"It is a social reality that women are expected (and often also pressurised) to beget children immediately after marriage and also forced to take up household chores in accordance with their stereotypical roles in the family. This harms their educational as well as economic pursuits and often impinges on their reproductive autonomy as well," the plea said.

It added that a higher minimum age will ensure "more autonomy to women in every sense".

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Madhyakalin Bharat By Satish Chandra, Prachin Bharat By Ramsaran Sharma And Adhunik Bharat By Vipin Chander (History Old Ncert Textbook Class-11 And 12 Hindi 1990 ) Set Of 3 BooksSubramonium prasadDelhi High CourtSupreme CourtDelhi delhi high courtSeveral supreme courtU.k. high court`delhi high courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

NationalDelhi High Court: Disruption of Parliament viewed as a serious threat

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

National‘Unavoidable reasons’: Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav's joint Bihar rally postponed

NationalRajasthan CM pledges better facilities after laying foundation stone for Isarda-Dausa drinking water project

NationalTargeting us over Russian oil purchase unjustified and unreasonable: India responds to Trump

NationalOdisha: Transport Dept official held for owning assets 6 times beyond known income sources

NationalKalyan Banerjee attacks Mahua Moitra after announcing his resignation as party Chief Whip in LS