City
Epaper

Delhi riots: Can repetition turn a falsehood into truth, argues Umar Khalid's counsel

By IANS | Updated: April 25, 2024 00:00 IST

New Delhi, April 24 2020 Delhi riots 'larger conspiracy' case accused Umar Khalid's advocate Trideep Pais on Wednesday ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 24 2020 Delhi riots 'larger conspiracy' case accused Umar Khalid's advocate Trideep Pais on Wednesday challenged the Delhi Police's repeated mention of his client's name in the charge sheet.

Appearing before Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai of Karkardooma courts during the bail arguments, Pais argued against the media trial and stressed the need for a thorough examination of witnesses and evidence.

He questioned the validity of the charges against Khalid and criticised the prosecution's attempt to keep him in jail.

In the previous hearing, the Delhi Police had objected to granting bail to the former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) student and activist in the case, alleging that Khalid has a history of manipulating social media narratives to influence bail hearings.

Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad had informed the court that Khalid engaged with actors and politicians to amplify his narrative to create public sympathy, framing it as part of a "larger conspiracy".

Pais, on Wednesday, raised objections to the Delhi Police's handling of the charge sheet during bail arguments, criticising the repetitive mention of Khalid's name, and questioning whether repetition could turn a falsehood into truth.

He highlighted discrepancies in the treatment of other accused individuals and questioned the basis for Khalid's continued detention.

Pais challenged the prosecution's claim that Khalid's sharing of certain links with individuals constituted a criminal or terror act, seeking an examination of the evidence. He also raised concerns about the media trial, citing instances of anchors reading from the charge sheet on news channels.

Counsel stressed the need for a detailed analysis of witnesses and documents to determine the validity of the terror charges against Khalid, and criticised the prosecution for what he perceived as a lack of substantial evidence.

He also cited the chilling effect of anti-terror laws on freedom of expression, saying that individuals who speak out are silenced under the pretext of national security.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIran struggles to reopen Strait of Hormuz as missing sea mines complicate navigation: Report

Other SportsIPL 2026: Bangar, Pujara, Harbhajan, Karim share their thoughts ahead of high-voltage 'Rivalry Week'

NationalTejashwi has limited understanding, says JD(U) over remarks on Nitish Kumar

InternationalTrapped and Blackmailed: Ex Israeli Spox warns US-Iran ceasefire hinges on Hormuz blockade

NationalPM Modi always had respect for Nitish Kumar: Sanjay Jha as JD(U) leaders hail his RS entry

National Realted Stories

NationalSuch a crowd, public enthusiasm in my rallies in Bengal was not even witnessed in my Gujarat: PM Modi

NationalMaharashtra: NCP(SCP) MP Supriya Sule pays tribute to Mahatma Phule in Phulewada on 200th birth anniversary

NationalClash of titans in Bhabanipur: Will Suvendu repeat Nandigram amid Mamata's "Bangla Birodhi" pitch against BJP?

National"Governance is not cinema, there are no retakes": P Chidambaram slams TVK chief Vijay's political debut

NationalCARI Bengaluru becomes first CCRAS institute to achieve ISO 15189:2022 accreditation in Biochemistry, Haematology