City
Epaper

HC dismisses PIL challenging Delhi govt order of 100 pc physical opening of schools

By ANI | Updated: March 29, 2022 14:05 IST

The High Court on Tuesday dismisses the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Delhi Government order of 100 per cent physical opening of schools with effect from April 1, 2022, till the time all the schoolgoing children are completely vaccinated.

Open in App

The High Court on Tuesday dismissed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Delhi Government order of 100 per cent physical opening of schools with effect from April 1, 2022, till the time all the schoolgoing children are completely vaccinated.

The bench of Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla on Tuesday dismissed the plea said, "according to us parents are willing to send their wards to schools".

The petition further seeks direction from the Directorate of Education (DoE) to ensure that the schools give the parents of the school-going children a choice in the matter of sending their children to attend physical classes.

Petitioner Advocate Arvind Kumar Pandey, practising lawyer states that the decision of the Delhi Government to open fully offline schools for children between the ages of 4-12 years old who are not being administered any vaccination and 12-14 years old whose vaccination has just started and to expose them to the vagaries of COVID-19 that too at a time when the danger of the probable fourth wave is looming large in the light of the emergence of a new variant.

The plea further states that, with the requirement of social distancing norms to be enforced without any commensurate increase in the spatial infrastructure of the schools, hence the social distancing norms will definitely be on a toss putting the lives of these children (4-12 years old and 12-14 years old) at major risk.

This hazardous decision will lead to the violation of the right to live with choiceand dignity guaranteed under Article 21 as the decision to expose one's life to such serious dangers should be one's own and innocent children are incapable of making such choices. Even the parent of the schoolgoing children are not given any choice when the decision of 100% offline school is imposed on them, the plea read.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Vipin sanghiNavin ChawlaHigh CourtPublic Interest LitigationHong kong high courtNaveen chawla
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

NationalCan Mother-in-Law File Case Against Daughter-in-Law Under Domestic Violence Act? Here’s What Allahabad High Court Rules

NationalOdisha: High Court Grants Divorce Over Wife’s Mental Harassment and Suicide Threats

MumbaiBombay HC Upholds Divorce Over Spouse’s Suicide & Imprisonment Threats

NationalHC Directs Centre to Decide on Renaming India to Bharat or Hindustan

National Realted Stories

NationalBengal CM gets pleasure in mocking Ahmedabad plane crash: Amit Malviya

National‘Where protocol paused’: A portrait of love on Hiraben Modi’s birth anniversary

NationalPresident Murmu to attend MP Govt's programme on World Sickle Cell Day tomorrow

National'Pro-Pakistan' stand: Assam Police nab one more person in Nalbari

NationalHoneymoon murder case: Meghalaya Police question Sonam, Raja Raghuvanshi's families in Indore