City
Epaper

If woman says no, it is offence; relationship cannot put it on different pedestal: Delhi HC on marital rape

By ANI | Updated: January 11, 2022 20:25 IST

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday questioned how the dignity of a married woman is not affected as an unmarried woman when the man imposes himself on her and remarked that relationship cannot put it on a different pedestal as a woman remains a woman.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday questioned how the dignity of a married woman is not affected as an unmarried woman when the man imposes himself on her and remarked that relationship cannot put it on a different pedestal as a woman remains a woman.

The observation came when a Division Bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and C Hari Shankar was hearing the petitions relating to the criminalization of marital rape.

Justices Rajiv Shakdher asked Delhi Government Counsel Nandita Rao why does it affect an unmarried woman's dignity but does not affect a married woman's dignity.

Justices Shakdher's question came when the was court was informed by Delhi Government counsel that married women can seek remedy under section 498 A of IPC. Delhi Government counsel also apprised the court that as of today, FIRs are registered by the spouses under sections 377, 498A and 326 of IPC.

The court asked why a man forcing himself on a woman without her consent affects the dignity of an unmarried woman but does not affect the dignity of a married woman.

Justice Rajiv Shakdher also remarked that Section 375 of India Penal Code dealt with the situation that the offence has taken place and the exception creates firewall "Is that firewall is justifiable on the test of Article 14 and 21, it is only that particular narrow aspect that we have a look into," the court said.

Justice Rajiv Shakdher further added that the only reason the accused is not visited by the penal provision is because of the exception, so the core issue, therefore, is would it stand Article 14 and 21.

The court also put an example saying that imagine a woman is having a menstrual cycle, husband says he wants to have sex and brutalizes her. Delhi Government counsel replied that then it is an offence but not under Section 375 of IPC.

Justice Rajiv Shakdher remarked that when a girlfriend or live-in partner says no, it is an offence. "The relationship cannot put it on a different pedestal. A woman remains a woman," Justice Shakdher said.

The court will continue hearing the matter on Wednesday relating to the criminalization of marital rape. The petitioners include NGOs RIT Foundation and All India Democratic Women's Association who have challenged an exception to Section 375 and of the Indian Penal Code.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Delhi High CourtDelhi GovernmentRajiv shakdher
Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentSunjay Kapur Property Dispute: Delhi HC Backs Karisma Kapoor’s Children, Rejects Priya Kapur’s Secrecy Bid

EntertainmentAR Rahman Secures Relief as Delhi High Court Overturns Single-Judge Order in Veera Raja Veera Copyright Case

NationalSupreme Court Adjourns Hearing on Bail Pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and Others in Delhi Riots Case

MumbaiBomb Threat At Bombay Hight Court Entire Premises Evacuated

NationalBomb Threat at Delhi High Court: Email Claims 'Judge's Chamber Will Explode Shortly

National Realted Stories

NationalKerala MLA roughed up in his constituency amid row over increasing pollution

NationalRahul Gandhi pays tribute to Kamaraj, celebrates leader's enduring legacy of simplicity and social reform

NationalVillager brutally killed by Maoists in Chhattisgarh's Bijapur over alleged police link

NationalCM Khandu hails Assam Rifles, villagers for swift rescue in Arunachal landslide; expresses grief over deaths of two workers

NationalAndhra Pradesh Governor, CM pay tributes to Mahatma Gandhi, Lal Bahadur Shastri