City
Epaper

Justice Nariman strongly opposes Election commission bill, says it is threat to Independence

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: December 15, 2023 20:30 IST

On Friday, December 15, former Supreme Court judge Justice Rohinton Nariman delivered the 30th Smt Bansari Sheth Endowment Lecture ...

Open in App

On Friday, December 15, former Supreme Court judge Justice Rohinton Nariman delivered the 30th Smt Bansari Sheth Endowment Lecture at the Durbar Hall of the Asiatic Society of Mumbai. The lecture aimed at the theme of 'The Constitution of India: Checks and Balances.' This event was presided over by yet another former Supreme Court judge, Justice BN Srikrishna. During this event Rohinton Nariman strongly criticized the election commission bill, requesting the court to reject it as he believed it could harm the independence of the election commission.

Justice Nariman expressed his concern and opposed the bill stating that it could threaten the autonomy of the Election Commission. He also shared the consequences of the bill and stressed the importance of the court interference to ensure the fairness of the election. Nariman also dived into various issues, including the process of disqualifying members, particularly in cases of dereliction. The establishment of an election judiciary headed by a Supreme Court judge to address and resolve such disputes. Emphasizing on the importance of keeping constitutional bodies like the EC independent, Justice Nariman precautioned against giving too much power to executive bodies and the opposition leader. He also warned against appointing individuals whose independence might be compromised, emphasizing the need for a fair electoral process.

Talking about the Supreme Court decision on Article 370, Justice Nariman questioned turning a state into two Union Territories without a democratic government for an extended period. He expressed concern about governors delaying bill approval, citing a case in Kerala where bills were held up for over 23 months. Justice Nariman also discussed recent events affecting media freedom, such as the ban on a BBC documentary about the Prime Minister. He emphasized the importance of upholding constitutional principles, especially those in Part IV, which addresses the Directive Principles of State Policy. Summoning constitutional provisions like Article 3, Justice Nariman stressed the federal principle and the need to distribute power. He expressed confidence that if passed, the Election Commission Bill would face legal challenges and called for its potential rejection due to its arbitrary nature.

Tags: Election CommissionArticle 370 Verdict
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

NationalElection Commission Launches Nationwide Training for Over 1 Lakh Booth Level Officers

NationalWho Is Gyanesh Kumar? ‘Kahwa Man’ Assumes Charge as 26th Chief Election Commissioner of India

MaharashtraElection Commission on Rahul Gandhi’s Allegations of Electoral Irregularities in Maharashtra, Says ‘Will Respond With Full Facts’

MaharashtraSupriya Sule Demands Re-Elections in Constituencies Affected by Symbol Confusion in Maharashtra Polls

National Realted Stories

NationalPakistani Drone Shot Down Near Amritsar Border, Debris Recovered by Security Forces

National32 airports shut till May 15 as tensions escalate between India-Pakistan

NationalIMF reimbursement to Pak will not help in de-escalation of hostilities with India: J&K CM Omar

NationalMissile-like object falls from sky in Balotara, drone debris found in Jaisalmer

NationalIndia Fires Ballistic Missiles at 4 Airbases in Pakistan After Drone Attacks