City
Epaper

Kerala Gold smuggling: Sivasankar's activities within definition of concealment under PMLA, says ED

By ANI | Updated: December 18, 2020 22:40 IST

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Friday stated in the Kerala High Court that former principal secretary of the Kerala Chief Minister's Office (CMO) M Sivasankar's activities comes squarely within the definition of concealment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Open in App

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Friday stated in the Kerala High Court that former principal secretary of the Kerala Chief Minister's Office (CMO) M Sivasankar's activities comes squarely within the definition of concealment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

In the hearing of the bail petition, filed by Sivasankar, the ED further said that Kerala Gold Smuggling Case accused Swapna Suresh didn't mention Sivasankar's name initially because he was influential.

The Court reserved the matter for orders.

The ED further stated, "Lower court order denying bail to Sivasankar was well-reasoned. The joint locker operated by Kerala Gold Smuggling Case accused Swapna Suresh and Sivasankar as well as a separate locker she held with Sivasankar's Chartered Accountant. Swapna was not a person of means, she could not have Rs 64 Lakh and gold sovereigns with her."

It further said that Sivasankar had asked for updates on the locker, which showed he had an interest in the money.

"She has admitted that Sivasankar was aware of the gold smuggling. This is the testimony of a co-conspirator. Accused can be given access to the material only after a probe is complete."

The ED further said that Sivasankar telephoned Customs officials on her behalf to clear smuggled gold through customs checks.

"They said we have no material, these days no one makes a telephone call. We make WhatsApp calls, which are encrypted. Difficult to get records of these, but cannot say we have no material.

The investigation is still going on. ED empowered to investigate and investigation ongoing," it added.

The ED concluded by saying that this was not a simple case, as Sivasankar had influence, and power, the wherewithal to tamper with evidence, and influence witnesses.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Other SportsIndia beat Australia to storm into the final of Women’s T20 World Cup Cricket for Blind

NationalAfter Bihar poll debacle, Prashant Kishor's Jan Suraaj dissolves all organisational units

NationalBengal govt tells DMs to ensure development work continues alongside SIR exercise

AurangabadMIT's social commitment: Rs 25 L cheque given to CM's Relief Fund

NationalTN CM Stalin to visit Coimbatore & Erode next week, inaugurate projects valued at over Rs 800 crore

National Realted Stories

NationalUddhav Thackeray slams BJP, RSS for spreading ‘poison of language’

National'Unity March': Delhi CM Rekha Gupta takes 'Swadeshi', 'Drug-Free India' pledges

NationalK'taka set for 'explosive political developments', claims Kumaraswamy amid Cong leadership tussle

NationalTechnology essential to achieve universal health coverage in India: NHA official

NationalIn J&K’s Udhampur, farmers reap good dividends from mushroom cultivation