City
Epaper

Kerala Gold smuggling: Sivasankar's activities within definition of concealment under PMLA, says ED

By ANI | Updated: December 18, 2020 22:40 IST

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Friday stated in the Kerala High Court that former principal secretary of the Kerala Chief Minister's Office (CMO) M Sivasankar's activities comes squarely within the definition of concealment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Open in App

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Friday stated in the Kerala High Court that former principal secretary of the Kerala Chief Minister's Office (CMO) M Sivasankar's activities comes squarely within the definition of concealment under Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

In the hearing of the bail petition, filed by Sivasankar, the ED further said that Kerala Gold Smuggling Case accused Swapna Suresh didn't mention Sivasankar's name initially because he was influential.

The Court reserved the matter for orders.

The ED further stated, "Lower court order denying bail to Sivasankar was well-reasoned. The joint locker operated by Kerala Gold Smuggling Case accused Swapna Suresh and Sivasankar as well as a separate locker she held with Sivasankar's Chartered Accountant. Swapna was not a person of means, she could not have Rs 64 Lakh and gold sovereigns with her."

It further said that Sivasankar had asked for updates on the locker, which showed he had an interest in the money.

"She has admitted that Sivasankar was aware of the gold smuggling. This is the testimony of a co-conspirator. Accused can be given access to the material only after a probe is complete."

The ED further said that Sivasankar telephoned Customs officials on her behalf to clear smuggled gold through customs checks.

"They said we have no material, these days no one makes a telephone call. We make WhatsApp calls, which are encrypted. Difficult to get records of these, but cannot say we have no material.

The investigation is still going on. ED empowered to investigate and investigation ongoing," it added.

The ED concluded by saying that this was not a simple case, as Sivasankar had influence, and power, the wherewithal to tamper with evidence, and influence witnesses.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

International"President secured a historic trade agreement with the EU that puts America first": White House

International'Continue to work in good faith with Mexico,' says White House after conversation between Presidents on tariffs

CricketWe'll let him get away with that one: Doeschate delivers verdict on Gill's shocking run out

Cricket"Does not look great...": England's Atkinson on Woakes' injury following end of day's play at The Oval

International'President Trump has ended multiple global ceasefires, including India and Pakistan': White House

National Realted Stories

NationalUnder fire NCP minister Manikrao Kokate stripped of Agriculture Ministry portfolio; Dattatray Bharne given charge

NationalPrevious Left govt distributed jobs from party offices: Tripura CM Saha

NationalDo you have regulatory approval for Kaleshwaram project, Lokesh asks Telangana

NationalRajasthan records highest rainfall for month of July in 69 years

NationalDharmasthala mass grave case: SIT completes excavation at 6th burial site, recovers bones