City
Epaper

National Herald Case: Delhi Court Rejects Cognisance of ED Complaint Against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi

By Lokmat Times Desk | Updated: December 16, 2025 12:47 IST

Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court has ruled that Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi and other accused are not entitled ...

Open in App

Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court has ruled that Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi and other accused are not entitled to receive a copy of the FIR in proceedings linked to a fresh case registered by the Delhi Police’s Economic Offences Wing in the National Herald matter. The court stated that the Enforcement Directorate may continue further investigation, but clarified that cognisance cannot be taken at this stage. It observed that the ED’s case stems from a private complaint filed by Subramanian Swamy and subsequent summoning orders, rather than an FIR. Consequently, the court declined to take cognisance of the ED chargesheet in the money laundering case.

Reacting to the order, Advocate Shaurya Veer Singh told ANI, "The judge said that the ED was misused and that BJP members turned it into a tool, and that, too, only against the opposition. Under Section 3 of the Money Laundering Act, the judge held that it is illegal to conduct a trial in court on behalf of a private complainant. That's why the judge did not take cognisance and further ordered the ED to explain why they alone took action in this case. There are the CBI and other departments, none of whom filed an FIR, so it was considered baseless and unfounded... The court further ordered the ED that if they want to make any submissions on the next date, January 16th, they should do so. Information was allowed in the UOW case, but cognisance was refused in this case..."

Also Read: Nagpur: Drone Spotted Over Solar Industries Airstrip, FIR Registered, Investigation Underway

Special Judge Vishal Gogne noted that the chargesheet was based on an investigation arising from a private complaint and not from an FIR of a predicate offence, making its cognisance legally impermissible. Reading the operative portion of the order, the judge said the Delhi Police’s EOW has already registered an FIR, and therefore, examining the ED’s arguments on merits would be premature. The ED has accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, late leaders Motilal Vora and Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda and Young Indian of conspiracy and money laundering, alleging acquisition of AJL properties worth about Rs 2,000 crore.

Tags: Sonia GandhiRahul GandhiEdEnforcement directorarteDelhi rouse avenue courtNational herald case
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalLionel Messi Interacts With Rahul Gandhi at Uppal Stadium in Hyderabad, Gifts Signed Jersey (Watch Videos)

National“Didn’t Answer Our Questions, Completely Defensive Response”: Rahul Gandhi on Amit Shah’s Lok Sabha Speech on Electoral Reforms (VIDEO)

EntertainmentWill You Watch Haq or Apologize?” — BJP’s Vishnu Vardhan Reddy Takes a Dig at Rahul Gandhi on the 1986 Muslim Women’s Rights Law

MumbaiMumbai: Six More Arrested in ₹58-Crore Digital Arrest Scam; Total Tally Rises to 26

NationalWho Is Matheus Ferrero? Rahul Gandhi Claims Brazilian Model Voted 22 Times in Haryana

National Realted Stories

NationalSuspected militants open fire in Manipur's Bishnupur, no injury reported, tensions escalate

NationalAll India Civil Services Lawn Tennis Tournament 2025–26 begins in Gandhinagar

NationalWomen-centric schemes have enhanced their dignity, says Assam CM

NationalOdisha: OHRC seeks CS report on outsourced employees’ plight

NationalAndhra Pradesh continues to play important role in India-US relations: Chandrababu Naidu