City
Epaper

Northeast Delhi violence: Sonia and Rahul Gandhi oppose plea seeking FIR against them

By ANI | Updated: August 30, 2022 20:00 IST

Congress leaders Sonia and Rahul Gandhi have opposed a plea seeking the registration of an FIR against them in connection with the alleged hate speech during the anti-CAA-NRC protest.

Open in App

Congress leaders Sonia and Rahul Gandhi have opposed a plea seeking the registration of an FIR against them in connection with the alleged hate speech during the anti-CAA-NRC protest.

The plea had sought a direction for lodging of FIR for alleged hate speech. The bench of justices Siddharth Mridul and Amit Sharma has adjourned the matter for September 27 for further hearing.

The affidavits filed on behalf of these two leaders denied the allegations of igniting communal violence in northeast Delhi in February 2020. It has been stated that the petitioner had not taken into account the speeches made by the leaders of the ruling party. They have been selectively targeted by the petitioner.

The affidavits filed on behalf of Congress leaders also stated that their speeches have not been taken in entirety. It is said that in no way do they promote enmity between any group on the basis of religion, race, place of birth and language etc. It has been stated that the speeches made by the members of the ruling party have been left out. It shows the coloured nature of the exercise.

This affidavit has been filed in the petition moved by an organisation Lawyers Voice seeking direction for registration of FIR against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi, and other leaders of other parties too.

The affidavit filed in the high court on August 1 stated that on the perusal of the speeches, no case warranting registration of FIR is made out against the respondents. The affidavit has also said there is no need for direction for the constitution of SIT against Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. It has also been stated no case for registration of FIR is made out in the matter. No interference by the court is not required in the matter.

It has been stated that only non-conformist, independent and opposition leaders are roped in by the petitioner.

Earlier the bench had issued notice on the impleadment application moved by the petitioners who sought registration of FIRs against several politicians for their alleged hate speeches.

The Division Bench had earlier issued notices to Congress Leaders Sonia Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Rahul Gandhi and BJP leaders Anurag Thakur, Pravesh Sahib Verma, Kapil Mishra and others.

The bench had sought the response of all politicians, activists and others on the application who wish to implead them as a party in the case. The court also issued notice to AAP's Manish Sisodia, Amanatullah Khan, AIMIM's Akbaruddin Owaisi, Waris Pathan and activist Harsh Mander including others in the matters.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Lawyers voicecongressRahul GandhiSiddharth mridulKerala youth congress
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalRSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat Says Political Leaders Should Step Aside at 75; Opposition Points Fingers at PM Modi

NationalGuru Purnima 2025: Rahul Gandhi Extends Wishes, Thanks Gurus for Showing Path of Truth and Compassion

InternationalNASA Job Cut: Over 2,000 Senior Officials to Exit Due to Trump-Era Budget Cuts

National"Wherever Congress Sees Land, It Grabs That Through Corruption": Bjp's Shehzad Poonawalla over National Herald Case

NationalCongress Misleading People by Claiming BJP Wants to Change Constitution, Says Telangana BJP chief

National Realted Stories

NationalTwo-day police conference in Jaipur to check human trafficking

NationalCongress flags five key objections to Special Intensive Revision in Bihar

NationalCare of senior citizens is the community's responsibility: Delhi Speaker Vijender Gupta

NationalNavi Mumbai International Airport must be completed by Sep 30: Maha CM

NationalWBSSC may face technical difficulties in detecting 'tainted' candidates seeking fresh recruitment