City
Epaper

Plea in Delhi HC seeks to enforce humane methods in animal husbandry procedures

By ANI | Updated: August 10, 2020 15:05 IST

A public interest litigation (PIL) was moved in the Delhi High Court on Monday seeking directions to the central government to define the "prescribed manner" for painful animal husbandry procedures for cattle.

Open in App

A public interest litigation (PIL) was moved in the Delhi High Court on Monday seeking directions to the central government to define the "prescribed manner" for painful mal husbandry procedures for cattle.

The NGO, People for the Ethical Treatment of mals (PETA) India, approched the High Court seeking directions to the central government to make rules related to cruelty to mals.

The plea sought making rules to mandate the use of anaesthetics prior to castration, replacement of outdated practices such as nose roping with face halters and branding with radio frequency identification, and breeding of hornless cattle (instead of dehorning).

It said that following advisories by the mal Welfare Board of India and the Department of mal Husbandry and Dairying in this regard, many state mal husbandry departments directed their veterinarians to implement the use of humane methods.

The plea said also alleged that in the absence of an enforceable law defining, improving, and regulating these methods, mals continue to be treated cruelly during such procedures.

The petition pointed out that the current methods for euthanasia, in situations when it's cruel to keep an mal alive, as mandated by The Prevention of Cruelty to mals Act (PCA), 1960, and when a massive number of mals are to be killed for the purpose of disease control, as mandated by The Prevention and Control of Infectious and Contagious Diseases in mals Act, 2009 - often cause tremendous pain and suffering to mals before death, in contravention of the principle of euthanasia and the mandate of the PCA Act, 1960.

It said that Section 11 of the PCA Act, 1960, defines the acts which amount to treating mals cruelly - however, Sub-Section 3 offers an exception and consequentially deems certain mal husbandry procedures, including the dehorning of cattle and the castration, branding, and nose roping of any mal, not to be cruel, provided that they're done in a "prescribed manner".

Section 38 of the PCA Act, 1960, gives power to the central government to make rules to define the method of euthanasia and prescribe the manner for mal husbandry procedures, it added.

( With inputs from ANI )

Open in App

Related Stories

CricketKL Rahul EXPLAINS His Unique 'Two-Finger-in-Mouth' Celebration After Scoring Century During IND vs WI 1st Test in Ahmedabad (VIDEO)

BusinessMalaysian companies keen to invest in Amaravati

NationalMalaysian companies keen to invest in Amaravati

InternationalFirst Jewish candidate in Syrian elections in decades

NationalNavi Mumbai International Airport will be named after Loknete D B Patil: Maha CM

National Realted Stories

NationalStable and predictable tax policy is key for growth: NITI Aayog CEO

NationalDelhi HC declines to transfer rent recovery suit, imposes 50,000 cost for ‘imaginary story’

NationalPunjab CM announces repair, upgrade of 19,491-km rural link roads

NationalCBI submits final chargesheet in Bengal primary teachers' recruitment case; names of 3 new accused included

NationalBihar: Women beneficiaries get assistance under Mahila Rozgar Yojana, thank govt