City
Epaper

Plea in Delhi HC seeks to enforce humane methods in animal husbandry procedures

By ANI | Updated: August 10, 2020 15:05 IST

A public interest litigation (PIL) was moved in the Delhi High Court on Monday seeking directions to the central government to define the "prescribed manner" for painful animal husbandry procedures for cattle.

Open in App

A public interest litigation (PIL) was moved in the Delhi High Court on Monday seeking directions to the central government to define the "prescribed manner" for painful mal husbandry procedures for cattle.

The NGO, People for the Ethical Treatment of mals (PETA) India, approched the High Court seeking directions to the central government to make rules related to cruelty to mals.

The plea sought making rules to mandate the use of anaesthetics prior to castration, replacement of outdated practices such as nose roping with face halters and branding with radio frequency identification, and breeding of hornless cattle (instead of dehorning).

It said that following advisories by the mal Welfare Board of India and the Department of mal Husbandry and Dairying in this regard, many state mal husbandry departments directed their veterinarians to implement the use of humane methods.

The plea said also alleged that in the absence of an enforceable law defining, improving, and regulating these methods, mals continue to be treated cruelly during such procedures.

The petition pointed out that the current methods for euthanasia, in situations when it's cruel to keep an mal alive, as mandated by The Prevention of Cruelty to mals Act (PCA), 1960, and when a massive number of mals are to be killed for the purpose of disease control, as mandated by The Prevention and Control of Infectious and Contagious Diseases in mals Act, 2009 - often cause tremendous pain and suffering to mals before death, in contravention of the principle of euthanasia and the mandate of the PCA Act, 1960.

It said that Section 11 of the PCA Act, 1960, defines the acts which amount to treating mals cruelly - however, Sub-Section 3 offers an exception and consequentially deems certain mal husbandry procedures, including the dehorning of cattle and the castration, branding, and nose roping of any mal, not to be cruel, provided that they're done in a "prescribed manner".

Section 38 of the PCA Act, 1960, gives power to the central government to make rules to define the method of euthanasia and prescribe the manner for mal husbandry procedures, it added.

( With inputs from ANI )

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalTwo killed, six injured in US Los Angeles mass shooting

NationalShibu Soren’s last rites today in Nemra Village; Rahul Gandhi, Kharge to attend

NationalPM Modi to address NDA parliamentary party meeting today

InternationalTaiwan records heightened Chinese military activity around its territory

InternationalThailand-Cambodia talks on positive track, says Malaysian defence chief

National Realted Stories

NationalKarti Chidambaram backs India's firm rebuttal to Trump's tariff move

NationalOdisha to set up 835 model primary schools in first phase of flagship scheme

NationalHow US encouraged India to buy Russian oil to stabilise global energy markets

NationalDelhi Crime: Girl Shot Dead Inside Doctor’s Clinic in Jahangirpuri; Attacker on the Run

NationalCong's Manish Tewari invokes 1971 to counter US tariff move on India