City
Epaper

Police cannot serve notices through WhatsApp or electronic modes: SC

By IANS | Updated: January 27, 2025 19:05 IST

New Delhi, Jan 27 The Supreme Court has taken a view that police machinery should not serve notices ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 27 The Supreme Court has taken a view that police machinery should not serve notices to the accused through WhatsApp or other electronic modes.

“All the States/UTs must issue a Standing Order to their respective Police machinery to issue notices under Section 41-A of CrPC, 1973/Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 only through the mode of service as prescribed under the CrPC, 1973/BNSS, 2023. It is made amply clear that service of notice through WhatsApp or other electronic modes cannot be considered or recognised as an alternative or substitute to the mode of service recognised and prescribed under
the CrPC, 1973/BNSS, 2023,” said a bench of Justices MM Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal.

The Justice Sundresh-led Bench added that states and Union Territories(UTs) must issue an additional Standing Order to their respective Police machinery to issue notices to the accused persons or otherwise, only through the mode of service as prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 or BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita) 2023.

Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, amicus curiae (friend of the court) flagged that the service of notice is to be made in person, as contemplated under the law, and not through WhatsApp or other electronic modes.

Luthra added that notice(s) under Section 41-A of CrPC, 1973 were sent to the accused through WhatsApp, but the accused did not appear before the Investigating Officers and no action was taken against such erring officers.

Further, he brought to the attention of the top court a Standing Order issued by DGP (Director General of Police), Haryana, permitting officials to serve notices in person or through WhatsApp, e-mail, SMS or any other electronic mode.

The amicus curiae referred to the decision of the apex court in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022), upholding the Delhi High Court’s view that notice served through WhatsApp or other electronic modes is not contemplated as a mode of service under Section 41-A of CrPC, 1973 (now Section 35 of BNSS, 2023) since the same is not in accordance with Chapter VI of CrPC, 1973 (now Chapter VI of BNSS, 2023) and hence cannot be treated as a valid mode of serving notice.

He also made reference to Section 532 of BNSS, 2023 which states that all trials, inquiries and proceedings may be held in electronic mode, by use of electronic communication or use of audio-video electronic means, but does not permit notice under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 to be served through WhatsApp or other electronic modes.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi: One Found Dead in Lift After Fire Erupts at Vishal Mega Mart in Karol Bagh (Watch Video)

Business"We are trying to remove all trade barriers," says Onkar Kanwar of BRICS Business Council

EntertainmentTahir Raj Bhasin talks about the 'progress' from ‘Mardaani’ to ‘Special Ops 2’

InternationalArgentina: Prime Minister Narendra Modi interacts with members of Indian diaspora

NationalGopal Khemka Shot Dead: Patna Businessman and BJP Leader Killed in Gandhi Maidan Area; Police Launch Probe

National Realted Stories

NationalTN issues advisory on Rabies prevention after dog bite deaths in Kerala

NationalMobile Passport Seva van to serve Krishnagiri in TN for three days from July 7

NationalOver 26,800 perform Amarnath Yatra in 2 days, another batch of 6,979 leave for Valley

NationalMaha: Oppn slams NCP MLA for political remarks while presiding in Assembly

NationalWBSSC job case: 'Untainted' teachers approach Calcutta HC accusing Bengal Police of harassing them defying court order