City
Epaper

SC adjourns hearing on 'Media One' plea

By ANI | Updated: April 7, 2022 20:35 IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted more time to the Centre to file a reply to 'Media One' plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted more time to the Centre to file a reply to 'Media One' plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

A Bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud listed the matter for further hearing on May 4.

The Court also extended its interim relief to Media One by staying the Central Government's decision banning the Malayalam news channel and allowed it to resume broadcasting.

Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the petitioner, had told the Court earlier that many people are losing their jobs and no media channel will be safe in the country if such practice is allowed.

The Supreme Court was hearing the Media One plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

In the Special Leave Petition by Media One, through advocate Pallavi Pratap, the channel said that it has filed the petition under dire and compelling circumstances.

The petition also said that it raises seminal questions of law impinging upon the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression as well as the importance of an independent, free and unbiased press guaranteed by the Constitution.

The Kerala High Court on February 8, 2022 upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of Media One from the list of permitted news channels citing security reasons.

The Court dismissed petitions filed by the channel against the government order.

While dismissing the writ petition challenging the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Kerala High Court made it clear that principles of natural justice and interference by Court in cases of national security have a very limited role.

Rejecting the pleas of the petitioner to keep the judgment in abeyance for two days, the Court replied, "I cannot extend it even for an hour."

The Single Bench of Justice N Nagaresh further observed in the order that "national security is considered as one of the most important sovereign functions for long."

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Kerala High CourtSupreme CourtDy ChandrachudKerala high courtsSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 2% a Day After Telecom Sector Plunges on Supreme Court Order

EntertainmentHAQ’ Promotions Begin: Emraan Hashmi, Yami Gautam Dhar Recreate Film Poster at Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Crashes Over 10% After Superme Court’s Written Order on AGR Dues Sparks Confuson

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Price Fall 3% After SC AGR Relief; Experts Call It a Risky Buy

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 9%, Touches ₹10 After Supreme Court Grants Relief in AGR Dues

National Realted Stories

NationalTwo killed in head-on collision of vehicles on Khargone-Indore road in MP

NationalSC declines to quash FIR against Abdullah Azam Khan in forgery case

NationalChhattisgarh: Kamala Sodi, woman Maoist with Rs 17 lakh bounty, surrenders

NationalPresident Droupadi Murmu hosts Women’s ODI WC-winning Indian team at Rashtrapati Bhavan 

NationalNari shakti in Bihar Assembly elections witnessing surge since 2010