City
Epaper

SC adjourns hearing on 'Media One' plea

By ANI | Updated: April 7, 2022 20:35 IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted more time to the Centre to file a reply to 'Media One' plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted more time to the Centre to file a reply to 'Media One' plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

A Bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud listed the matter for further hearing on May 4.

The Court also extended its interim relief to Media One by staying the Central Government's decision banning the Malayalam news channel and allowed it to resume broadcasting.

Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the petitioner, had told the Court earlier that many people are losing their jobs and no media channel will be safe in the country if such practice is allowed.

The Supreme Court was hearing the Media One plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of the news channel.

In the Special Leave Petition by Media One, through advocate Pallavi Pratap, the channel said that it has filed the petition under dire and compelling circumstances.

The petition also said that it raises seminal questions of law impinging upon the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression as well as the importance of an independent, free and unbiased press guaranteed by the Constitution.

The Kerala High Court on February 8, 2022 upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of Media One from the list of permitted news channels citing security reasons.

The Court dismissed petitions filed by the channel against the government order.

While dismissing the writ petition challenging the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Kerala High Court made it clear that principles of natural justice and interference by Court in cases of national security have a very limited role.

Rejecting the pleas of the petitioner to keep the judgment in abeyance for two days, the Court replied, "I cannot extend it even for an hour."

The Single Bench of Justice N Nagaresh further observed in the order that "national security is considered as one of the most important sovereign functions for long."

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Kerala High CourtSupreme CourtDy ChandrachudKerala high courtsSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalNo Toll Collection on Bad or Congested Roads: Supreme Court

EntertainmentNatashaa Fernandes on SC Order on Stray Dogs: Will It Solve the Problem or Create a New Crisis?

NationalCentre Opposes Lowering Age of Consent to 16 Under POCSO, Says Move Could Harm Minors

EntertainmentActor Darshan Arrested From Hosakerehalli Residence After Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Renukaswamy Murder Case

EntertainmentZara Khan Urges Supreme Court to Reconsider Order on Removing Stray Dogs from Delhi-NCR

National Realted Stories

NationalAssam Rifles recovers large cache of arms and ammunition in Mizoram

NationalOppn's uproar over Constitution Amendment Bill is fear of their own past: Rajasthan BJP chief

NationalMadhya Pradesh govt transfers nine IPS officers in major reshuffle

NationalBihar: 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' reaches Munger; Tejashwi, Rahul slam CM Nitish Kumar, ECI

NationalSC dismisses petitions to review quashing of land allotment in Hyderabad