City
Epaper

SC clarifies asking lawyers not to use mobile phones to attend VC hearing was only advisory, no bar on attending hearing through phones

By ANI | Published: January 19, 2022 9:11 PM

The Supreme Court on Wednesday clarified that the notice issued by it on January 17 asking lawyers to use laptops or desktops and avoid mobile phones for virtual court hearings was only an advisory in nature.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Wednesday clarified that the notice issued by it on January 17 asking lawyers to use laptops or desktops and avoid mobile phones for virtual court hearings was only an advisory in nature.

Secretary-General of the Supreme Court Virender Kumar Bansal in a letter to the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA), said that asking lawyers to use desktop and laptops was only an advisory in nature and there is no bar on use of mobiles.

The SG said that any lawyer who does not have laptop or desktop can join court proceedings using mobile phones, ensuring that such advocate is properly visible and audible to the Court.

SG's communication said, "Contrary to the concern expressed by you, a careful reading of the notice dated January 17, 2022 reveals that it is merely advisory in nature and nowhere in the said advisory it is stated that the usage of mobile phones is barred."

On January 17, the top court asked lawyers to avoid mobile phones for court hearings through video conferencing to avoid any disruption in the court proceedings and inconvenience to the Judges.

The top court notified 'best practices for virtual court proceedings' and asked all advocates to avoid joining hearings through their mobile phones.

"All Advocates and party in persons have been requested to join the Cisco Webex application for joining the court hearings through Desktops or Laptops with a stable internet connectivity, preferably wired, to avoid any disruption in the court proceedings and inconvenience to the Judges," the circular of January 17 issued by the apex court stated.

The circular has said the advocates and party-in-person must join the video conferencing hearing preferably using a headset enabled microphone and audio system. It has also asked them to join hearing through a single device and have also been asked to close all background applications running on their devices for best VC experience.

During that day, the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana expressed displeasure over lawyers attending virtual hearing through their mobile phones as the devices make it difficult for judges to hear or see advocates during the hearings.

CJI Ramana asked advocates to use laptop and desktop while appearing in matters through video conferencing before the court and avoid using mobile phones.

The CJI Bench has said it has been facing difficultly in hearing or seeing the advocates when they appear through mobile phones.

In view of rising number of COVID-19 cases, the apex court on January 2 decided to shift to the virtual system of hearings from January 3 for two weeks in view of the rising Omicron varient of COVID-19 cases.

Suspending the physical and hybrid option of the hearing, the apex court decided to shift to complete virtual hearing for two weeks.

A statement issued by the top court, which had started physical hearings from October 7, said the arrangement of the virtual proceedings shall continue for two weeks.

By another circular, the top court judges decided to work from their residencial offices.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtSupreme court advocates-on-record association
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Rejects NGO’s Demolition Plea, Cautions Against Opening Pandora’s Box

MaharashtraSupreme Court Issues Notice to Ajit Pawar Faction Over NCP Symbol Dispute Ahead of Maharashtra Assembly Election

PunePune: Supreme Court Road Safety Panel Mandates Helmet Use for Riders and Pillion to Curb Road Accidents

NationalSupreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Section 6A of Citizenship Act, 1955, Granting Citizenship to Assam Immigrants

Maharashtra“What Are They Trying To Prove by Replacing Sword With Constitution?”: Sanjay Raut on Supreme Court’s New Lady Justice Statue (Watch Video)

National Realted Stories

NationalManipur Police rescue minor girl, held accused

NationalCongress again demands removal of Maharashtra DGP for fair & transparent election

NationalAll Employees of Tirupati Balaji Temple Should Be Hindus, Says TTD Chief BR Naidu

NationalAssam online trading scam: Accused hiding information during interrogation, says police

NationalManipur govt to set up memorial for Major Ralengnao Bob Khathing