City
Epaper

SC declines to interfere in Delhi HC order on tenant-landlord dispute case

By ANI | Updated: February 12, 2022 17:45 IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court order dismissing a plea with a fine of Rs 50,000 against a company in connection with eviction from a tenanted premise.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court order dismissing a plea with a fine of Rs 50,000 against a company in connection with eviction from a tenanted premise.

"We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petition is dismissed," said a bench of justices Abdul Nazeer and Aniruddha Bose.

The top court was hearing the company plea challenging a Delhi HC order. The Delhi High Court had dismissed a plea with a cost of Rs 50,000 against the petitioner observing that "dishonest litigants cannot be allowed to abuse the process of the Court."

The HC had also said that the conduct of the petitioner itself would disentitle the petitioner of any relief in the present petition.

The HC had rejected the plea of the company challenging the order dated November 18, 2021, passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC), Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby the Executing Court has issued warrants of execution in respect of the order/decree dated July 12, 2010.

On July 12, 2010, the ARC allowed the eviction petition filed by the landlord as the tenant failed to file the leave to defend. However, in terms of settlement arrived at between the tenant and landlord, 10 years' time was granted to the tenant to vacate the tenanted premises. Upon expiry of 10 years, the landlord filed the execution petition from which the present petition arises.

Further, in the order dated November 18, 2021, passed by the Executing Court, request of the tenant to file a reply to the execution petition was rejected and warrants of execution of the order/decree dated July 12, 2010, were issued after noting that no appeal/revision has been preferred by the tenant against the order/decree dated July 12, 2010.

The court was dealing with a petition filed by the tenant against his landlord seeking eviction from tenanted premises in Ajmeri Gate. The petitioner company has challenged an order dated November 18, 2021, passed by the Additional Rent Controller in Tis Hazari Courts, whereby the Executing Court has issued warrants of execution in respect of the order/decree dated July 12, 2010.

The respondent landlord was represented by advocates Prabhav Ralli and Shivaz Berry.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Shivaz berryDelhi High CourtSupreme CourtAbdul NazeerDelhi delhi high courtSeveral supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

National Realted Stories

NationalBoats return with bumper catch after 61-day fishing ban ends in TN

NationalNGT directs TNPCB to issue dos and don’ts ahead of Ganesh festival

NationalBulandshahr Accident: Five Dead, One Injured as Car Bursts Into Flames After Hitting Sides of Bridge in Uttar Pradesh

National‘Arnala', India's first indigenous anti-submarine ship to be commissioned today

NationalAgra-Firozabad Road Accident: 4 Killed As Speeding Pickup Carrying Mangoes Falls Off Shahdara Flyover on Morning Walkers (Watch)