City
Epaper

SC declines WB's plea for appointing its own DGP without UPSC involvement

By ANI | Updated: September 3, 2021 13:50 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea of the West Bengal government seeking permission to appoint its own Director General of Police (DGP) without the Union Public Service Commission's (UPSC) involvement.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a plea of the West Bengal government seeking permission to appoint its own Director General of Police (DGP) without the Union Public Service Commission's (UPSC) involvement.

The Bench of Justices LN Rao, BR Gavai and BV Nagarathna said the state had filed a similar application in the past too which had been rejected.

It said such applications are an "abuse of the process of law" and added that it is not expected from a state government.

The West Bengal government wants to have complete freedom to select DGP and has questioned the UPSC's role in the state DGP's appointment.

As the Bench refused to entertain the application, senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for the state, sought permission to withdraw it.

The apex court allowed the state to withdraw the application and also allowed it to implead in the main case relating to police reforms.

The state government has contended that the involvement of UPSC in the selection of the DGP of the state was not permissible under the Constitution of India and was against the federal fabric of the Constitution.

It has contended that UPSC has neither the jurisdiction nor the expertise to consider and appoint the DGP of a state as the same is not in consonance with the Indian federal System of governance.

The state has autonomy and ultimate power of superintendence over police officials, the West Bengal government stated in the application.

It said the apex court's landmark 2006 police reforms judgment erred legally and constitutionally by assigning the UPSC the task of selecting a panel of three officers for the post of a state DGP.

In the landmark Prakash Singh judgment, the top court had ruled that states were required to select the DGP from among three senior-most police officers empanelled by the UPSC to stop the states from selecting a regime sensitive police officer to the top post and had granted the DGPs a fixed tenure of two years irrespective of their age of retirement.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Sidharth LuthraUnion Public Service CommissionPrakash SinghSupreme CourtDelhi commission
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

National‘Two rupee doctor’ of Kerala's Kannur passes away

NationalMinisters urge Kerala Governor to follow SC directives while making appointment to VC posts

NationalIllegal drone operators will be booked under Gangster Act: CM Yogi

NationalSeven injured as passenger bus overturns in MP's Shahdol

NationalAfter slamming Bihar SIR for 'deletions', Chidambaram flags 6.5 lakh voter additions in TN