City
Epaper

SC refuses to stay implementation of citizenship law, issues notice to Centre

By ANI | Updated: December 18, 2019 12:15 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the implementation of the Citizenship (Amenendment) Act 2019 and issued notice to the Central government on a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Act.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay the implementation of the Citizenship (Amenendment) Act 2019 and issued notice to the Central government on a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Act.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde, Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant while refusing on stay the implementation, said that the matter will be heard in January after the apex court opens following a winter break.

The Act provides citizenship to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian communities who faced religious persecution from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghstan and arrived in India before December 31, 2014.

During the course of proceedings, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for one of the petitioners, had sought a stay order on the newly amended law. While opposing it, Attorney General K K Venugopal, cited four judgements which say that the Act should not be stayed.

Venugopal said that the arguments on petition seeking stay would be "as lengthy as the petition". When many senior advocates started arguing at the same time, CJI Bobde said in some Supreme Court, only one lawyer can come and argue.

On this, the Attorney General (AG) said the Indian Supreme Court could emulate the practice in Pakistan Supreme Court, where only one podium is before the judges and only one lawyer at a time could argue.

Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay said that the people are protesting but don't know the details of the Act and the same needs to be publicised. "I visited Jamia, visited Seelampur. People don't know about the Act," he said.

CJI Bobde then asked AG for his thoughts on this "unusual request" and if a court order is needed for this.

AG assured the court that the same can be done by the government authorities and an order is not required.

The petitioners include Trinamool Congress (TMC) parliamentarian Mahua Moitra, Congress's Jairam Ramesh, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen's Asaduddin Owaisi, various NGOs, and Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), among others.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: indiaSupreme CourtAgTrinamool CongressK Venugopal
Open in App

Related Stories

CricketIND vs PAK 2025 Live Streaming: Head-to-Head Record, When and Where to Watch India vs Pakistan Asia Cup Final

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

National Realted Stories

NationalCentre approves mitigation, recovery and reconstruction projects worth Rs 4645.60 crore

NationalRajasthan: Steady decline in crime over last two years, claims police

NationalMaha: Five Dussehra rallies to be held tomorrow; all eyes on Uddhav Thackeray and Eknath Shinde

NationalCentre grants Rs 260.56 crore for rebuilding Wayanad hit by landslide

National‘Deep insult to freedom struggle’: Congress on honouring RSS