City
Epaper

SC reserves order on plea of death row convict, who claims to be kept in solitary confinement

By ANI | Updated: April 27, 2022 16:20 IST

The Supreme Court has reserved the judgement on a plea of a death row convict, who has claimed to be kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence, challenging the Karnataka High Court order.

Open in App

The Supreme Court has reserved its judgement on the plea of a death row convict, who has claimed to be kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence, challenging the Karnataka High Court order.

A bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha reserved the order on convict BA Umesh's plea.

Advocate appearing for the petitioner, Yug Mohit Chaudhry, said that the petitioner was kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence.

BA Umesh has moved the Supreme Court against the Karnataka High Court order, which dismissed his plea challenging the executability of his death sentence, pursuant to the rejection of his mercy petition filed before the President.

A case was registered against Umesh on February 28, 1998, by Peenya Police under Sections 376 (rape) 302 (murder) and 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

On October 27, 2006, the Sessions Court passed a sentence of death against the petitioner.

On February 18, 2009, Karnataka High Court supported the imposition of a death sentence.

On February 1, 2011, the Apex Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and upheld the sentence of the death penalty passed on the petitioner.

On February 8, 2011, the petitioner's mother filed a mercy petition before the President, which was rejected on May 12, 2013.

Counsel of the petitioner has argued before Karnataka HC that there has been an excessive and unexplained delay of two years three months and seven days, that is 827 days, in adjudicating the mercy petition thereby causing unnecessary and avoidable pain, suffering, mental torment which is in violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India.

Karnataka Government has opposed the submission that the accused has been kept in solitary confinement in jail.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Yug mohit chaudhrySupreme CourtSessions CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

NationalKerala Shocker: Court Sentences Man to Life Imprisonment For Murdering Father, Mother, Sister, and Aunt, Burning Their Dead Bodies

National Realted Stories

NationalCentre to launch special campaign to help pensioners from July 1

NationalK'taka BJP to launch public awareness campaign against 'Emergency'

NationalMoradabad Tragedy: Young Couple Dies by Suicide in Front of Goods Train

NationalDelhi: Three drug peddlers held, contrabands including MMDA & cocaine seized

NationalPM Modi's Odisha visit: CM Mohan Majhi reviews preparations at programme venue in Bhubaneswar