City
Epaper

SC reserves order on plea of death row convict, who claims to be kept in solitary confinement

By ANI | Updated: April 27, 2022 16:20 IST

The Supreme Court has reserved the judgement on a plea of a death row convict, who has claimed to be kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence, challenging the Karnataka High Court order.

Open in App

The Supreme Court has reserved its judgement on the plea of a death row convict, who has claimed to be kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence, challenging the Karnataka High Court order.

A bench of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, S Ravindra Bhat and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha reserved the order on convict BA Umesh's plea.

Advocate appearing for the petitioner, Yug Mohit Chaudhry, said that the petitioner was kept in solitary confinement right from the decision of the Sessions Court awarding him a death sentence.

BA Umesh has moved the Supreme Court against the Karnataka High Court order, which dismissed his plea challenging the executability of his death sentence, pursuant to the rejection of his mercy petition filed before the President.

A case was registered against Umesh on February 28, 1998, by Peenya Police under Sections 376 (rape) 302 (murder) and 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

On October 27, 2006, the Sessions Court passed a sentence of death against the petitioner.

On February 18, 2009, Karnataka High Court supported the imposition of a death sentence.

On February 1, 2011, the Apex Court dismissed the petitioner's appeal and upheld the sentence of the death penalty passed on the petitioner.

On February 8, 2011, the petitioner's mother filed a mercy petition before the President, which was rejected on May 12, 2013.

Counsel of the petitioner has argued before Karnataka HC that there has been an excessive and unexplained delay of two years three months and seven days, that is 827 days, in adjudicating the mercy petition thereby causing unnecessary and avoidable pain, suffering, mental torment which is in violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India.

Karnataka Government has opposed the submission that the accused has been kept in solitary confinement in jail.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Yug mohit chaudhrySupreme CourtSessions CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

National Realted Stories

NationalTMP chief calls for unity among Northeast’s indigenous people

NationalBEML's new unit in MP's Raisen to drive indigenous rail manufacturing for global markets

NationalJob quotas: Naga body to boycott govt events, including I-Day celebrations

NationalMadhya Pradesh: Chinese kite string injures four in Ratlam

NationalSC forms high-power committee to manage affairs of Shri Bankey Bihari Ji temple