City
Epaper

SC reserves order on pleas challenging amendments to SC/ST Act

By ANI | Published: October 03, 2019 1:30 PM

The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its order on a batch of petitions challenging the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018, which rules out any provision for anticipatory bail for a person accused of atrocities against the communities.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its order on a batch of petitions challenging the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018, which rules out any provision for anticipatory bail for a person accused of atrocities against the communities.

The Centre had made amendments to the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 1989 after its provisions were diluted by the apex court in March, last year. The court had held that there will be no automatic arrest on a complaint filed under the act and it can only be made after approval of the appointing authority. It also included a provision of anticipatory bail.

A bench of Justices Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and S Ravindra Bhat hinted that it will uphold the amendments made by Centre in the Act to restore immediate arrest and ban anticipatory bail.

"We are not diluting any provisions... these provisions will not be struck down. Law should be as it was... They will be left as it was prior to the judgement on review petition and amendments in the Act," the bench observed.

The court said that it will clarify whether the police can hold a preliminary probe before taking any action on a complaint under the Act, in a case it is of prima facie view that complaints are false.

The court observed that with regard to the 'anticipatory bail', the judgment of the constitution bench passed is not made out.

The old provision would be restored in light of the review petition delivered on September 30, the Court remarked.

The court had on Tuesday recalled its earlier order that diluted the stringent provisions of the SC/ST Act, 1989 after the Centre filed a review petition contending that the court should not have ventured to frame guidelines as it was in the domain of the legislature.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: The Supreme CourtThe CourtArun MishraVineet SaranRavindra Bhat
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSC Constitution Bench defers hearing after AG says govt has set up expert committee on arbitration

NationalSC Constitution Bench defers hearing after AG says govt has set up expert committee on arbitration

InternationalAfghanistan: Four people publicly flogged by Taliban

National2020 Delhi riots: SC adjourns Umar Khalid's bail plea hearing for July 24

PoliticsIsraeli parliament gives initial approval to controversial bill

National Realted Stories

NationalAndhra Pradesh: Six Killed After Bus Catches Fire in Palnadu District (Watch)

NationalPM Modi to address rallies in UP on May 16-17

NationalLS polls: PM Modi to campaign in Maharashtra today

NationalRajasthan Lift Collapse: 14 Rescued Including Three Injured as Rescue Operation Concludes at Kolihan Copper Mine in Jhunjhunu (Watch Video)

NationalFire erupts at Mumbai hoarding crash site, doused quickly