City
Epaper

School murder case: SC grants interim bail to student who allegedly slit junior's throat

By IANS | Updated: October 20, 2022 18:15 IST

New Delhi, Oct 20 The Supreme Court on Thursday granted interim bail to the accused in the chilling ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 20 The Supreme Court on Thursday granted interim bail to the accused in the chilling 2017 case, where he, 16 years old then, allegedly murdered a seven-year-old Class 2 student at a private school in Gurugram.

A bench of Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and J.K. Maheshwari noted that the accused has been in detention for nearly five years now.

Senior advocate Manan Kumar Mishra and advocate Durga Dutt, representing the accused, contended that their client has been in detention for nearly five years now, and the trial has not commenced so far. Recently, the Juvenile Justice Board had clarified that the accused student should be tried as adult and not as a juvenile.

The top court said the bail would be granted on terms and conditions as may be imposed by Gurugram sessions judge and the accused would have to remain under continued supervision of probation officer.

It has scheduled the matter for further hearing in January 2023.

The seven-year-old student was found with his throat slit outside the school's washroom on September 8, 2017.

The accused, then a Class 11 student, was accused of murdering the Class 2 student, which he picked at random, to allegedly defer an approaching examination and a parent-teacher meeting.

The top court noted that the petitioner was 16 when he was taken in detention and is 21 now. Although he is at present being housed in a correctional home, his continued detention pre-trial may have its own adverse effects, it added.

Counsel, for the accused, argued that there is no direct evidence against the petitioner, and there is no eye witness to the occurrence and a careful perusal of entire material would show that except the baseless suspicion, there is absolutely no material produced by the CBI to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence.

Counsel further argued that while dealing with the bail matter, none of the courts below have ever tried to examine the materials on records meticulously and there is nothing on record which could justify the prosecution of the petitioner in this case.A It is a settled principle of law that the suspicion howsoever strong it may be, cannot take the place of the evidence and a conviction cannot be based on a mere suspicion, counsel added.

Initially, the Gurugram police had arrested a school bus conductor for the murder. However, later, the investigation was handed over to the CBI, which arrested the accused, saying he had confessed to killing the Class 2 student.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Juvenile justice boardSupreme CourtDurga DuttManan kumar mishraSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

National Realted Stories

NationalFairPoint: Calling time on Pakistan's pretence, India leads where others flinch 

NationalShiv Sena (UBT) condemns Madan Mitra’s remarks on Kolkata law student rape case

NationalRahul Gandhi condoles Puri deaths, seeks probe into stampede

NationalEconomist hails India’s incredible social security growth after PM Modi cites ILO report in ‘Mann Ki Baat’

NationalOppn to boycott Maha CM's customary tea meet on eve of Monsoon Session