City
Epaper

Tenure of special judge hearing Babri Masjid case extended: UP govt tells SC

By ANI | Updated: September 13, 2019 15:45 IST

The Uttar Pradesh government on Friday informed the Supreme Court that it has complied with the top court's order to extend the tenure of Special Judge SK Yadav, who is hearing the Babri Masjid demolition case.

Open in App

The Uttar Pradesh government on Friday informed the Supreme Court that it has complied with the top court's order to extend the tenure of Special Judge SK Yadav, who is hearing the Babri Masjid demolition case.

A bench headed by Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman said that according to the data, the Uttar Pradesh government has complied with our earlier order extending the tenure of Lucknow Trial Court Special CBI Judge SK Yadav till April next year.

"We are satisfied. However, we have received a fax from the special court judge, in which, the judge, points that he will remain under the administrative control of the High Court," the bench said.

The apex court had in an order on July 19 this year, directed the extension of Justice Yadav's tenure until the trial is completed in six months, likely by April 30 next year.

The court had directed the Uttar Pradesh government to consult the Allahabad High Court to ensure that the tenure of the special judge is extended till the completion of the trial.

The development came after the judge wrote a letter to the top court in April this year seeking an extension of his tenure to complete the trial in the Babri Masjid demolition case.

Justice Yadav was set to retire on September 30, 2019.

In April 2017, the apex court had asked the special judge to complete the trial in two years.

Justice Yadav is hearing on a day-to-day basis, the case against senior BJP leaders -- Adv, Kalyan Singh and Murli Manohar Joshi -- in connection with the demolition of the disputed structure in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: Justice YadavHigh Court
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai Police Registers First FIR in Mahim for Feeding Pigeons Following BMC Complaint

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

NationalCan Mother-in-Law File Case Against Daughter-in-Law Under Domestic Violence Act? Here’s What Allahabad High Court Rules

NationalOdisha: High Court Grants Divorce Over Wife’s Mental Harassment and Suicide Threats

National Realted Stories

NationalIRDAI slaps Rs 5 crore penalty on Policybazaar for various violations

NationalDrone threat looms over India-Bangladesh border: Security agencies on high alert

NationalCongress failed to bring real change for the poor: Haryana CM

NationalSC refuses to give relief to CPI-M workers for severing legs of Kerala BJP MP

NationalBihar govt approves 13 departmental tableaux at Gandhi Maidan for Independence Day