City
Epaper

Will fight tooth and nail if Constitution is altered: Kharge on 'Secular' row

By IANS | Updated: June 30, 2025 16:58 IST

Bengaluru, June 30 Commenting on the controversy surrounding RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale’s statement on the removal of ...

Open in App

Bengaluru, June 30 Commenting on the controversy surrounding RSS General Secretary Dattatreya Hosabale’s statement on the removal of the words ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ from the Indian Constitution, AICC President Mallikarjun Kharge stated on Monday that any attempt to tamper with the Constitution would be strongly opposed.

Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, Kharge warned, “If they are going to touch any word in the Constitution, we will fight tooth and nail.”

“Dattatreya Hosabale is a man of Manusmriti. He doesn’t want poor people to progress. What has been practised for thousands of years, he wants to continue,” Kharge stated.

“Since they don’t want the poor to rise, he opposes Socialism, secularism, liberty, equality, and fraternity. He doesn't believe in these values. Therefore, I don’t want to say much about him — it's his party's line. The RSS has always been against the poor, the downtrodden, Scheduled Castes, and other marginalised communities,” he added.

“If they were truly concerned, they would have worked to eradicate untouchability. They claim to be champions of the Hindu religion. If that’s the case, they should remove untouchability,” Kharge remarked.

“They must involve all RSS workers in the effort to eliminate untouchability and promote unity in the country. Instead, they merely talk, make noise, and create confusion. This is very unfortunate, and we are firmly opposed to it,” he appealed.

The RSS leader stirred controversy last week when, speaking at an event in Delhi on last Thursday, he said, “During the Emergency, the words ‘Secular’ and ‘Socialist’ were added to the Constitution — they were not part of the original Preamble.”

He further stated, “Later, these words were never removed. Should they remain or not… a debate must happen on this. These two words were not in Babasaheb B.R. Ambedkar’s Constitution. During the Emergency, the country had no functioning Parliament, no rights, no judiciary, and yet these two words were added.”

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentHuma Qureshi's birthday wish for brother Saqib Saleem is all about 'Shukr'

NationalBengal polls: ECI-appointed poll observer removed from duty for not being aware of polling booth network

InternationalTrump warns of 50% tariffs on countries supplying arms to Iran hours after ceasefire announcement

PunePune Horror: Pregnant Woman Assaulted by In-Laws Over Money; Case Registered Against Four

Other SportsMonte Carlo Masters: Berrettini stuns Medvedev to reach third round

National Realted Stories

NationalMeat shops to be shifted outside municipal limits in Haridwar; traders express opposition

NationalGujarat: Heaviest portal beam successfully launched for Mumbai‑Ahmedabad bullet train project

National'Step to realising resolve of developed Rajasthan': Raj CM inspects under-construction Chambal aqueduct in Bundi

NationalEminent women, social activists hail Women’s Reservation Bill, call it transformative for society

NationalVijay targets DMK, BJP alliances at Tirunelveli rally; calls polls a 'historic fight for change’