Several supreme court, Court

New Delhi, Feb 10 The Supreme Court on Thursday said losing a good judicial officer without counselling and without providing an opportunity to introspect and re-think is not in the interest of the judiciary, and senior judges of high courts could advise the officer to withdraw it.A bench of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and B.R. Gavai said: "Losing a good judicial officer without counselling him/her and without giving him/her an opportunity to introspect and re-think, will not be in the interest of either the judicial officer or the judiciary. We find that it will be in the interest of the judiciary that such a practice is followed by all the High Courts."The bench emphasised that in some high courts, a practice is followed, that whenever a judicial officer having good track record tenders his/her resignation, an attempt is made by the senior judges of the high court to counsel and persuade him/her to withdraw the resignation."Valuable time and money are spent on training a judicial officer," said Justice Gavai, who authored the judgment on behalf of the bench. Senior counsel Indira Jaisingh and advocate Astha Sharma represented the woman officer in the top court.The apex court made the observation while directing reinstatement of a former Madhya Pradesh woman judicial officer, who resigned in 2014 following an inquiry into her sexual harassment allegations against a high court judge."We hold and declare that the petitioner's resignation from the post of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gwalior dated 15th July 2014, cannot be construed to be voluntary and as such, the order dated July 17, 2014, passed by the respondent No. 2, thereby accepting the resignation of the petitioner, is quashed and set aside," it said.The woman officer had resigned following her abrupt transfer from Gwalior to Sidhi. She said that her daughter was studying at Gwalior and she was in the final year of the board examination. The officer made two representations requesting retention at Gwalior for a period of 8 months so that her daughter could continue with her education at Gwalior, but this was not approved and then she resigned.The top court said: "No doubt, that a judicial officer while discharging his/her duties, is expected to be independent, fearless, impassionate and non-impulsive. But a judicial officer is also a human being. A judicial officer is also a parent. He/she could be a father or a mother."The bench said her transfer order was in contravention of the transfer policy and that the rejection of her two representations, in addition to being contrary to the transfer policy, were also arbitrary."The resignation letter in the present case, as has already been discussed hereinabove, appears to be on account of exasperation and frustration actuated by a thought, that injustice was being meted out to her by the very institution of judiciary," it added.Following her allegations of sexual harassment, 58 members of the Rajya Sabha sought to move a motion to impeach the high court judge. In 2015, an inquiry panel was set up which tabled its report in Rajya Sabha in December 2017 and concluded that the allegations of sexual harassment could not be "proved beyond reasonable doubt".The panel, which comprised a then Supreme Court judge, then Bombay High Court Chief Justice Manjula Chellur, and a senior advocate said the decision to transfer the officer "mid-session" was "not justified".After the high court declined to reinstate her, in 2018, the officer moved the Supreme Court citing the findings of the panel.Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Several Supreme CourtFOLLOW

Several supreme court, Latest News

In the wake of the controversy over wearing hijab, the Karnataka Primary and Secondary Education Department on Saturday said classes for pre-university students have been suspended in the state from February 12 to 15. ...

New Delhi, Feb 12 Amid the ongoing hijab row, a plea has been moved in the Supreme Court ... ...

The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Centre to file a response on a petition filed by the Supreme Court Employees' Welfare Association seeking to grant a benefit of Court Allowance to Officers and Employees of the Supreme Court of India on the patte ...

The Supreme Court on Friday adjourned for February 14 the hearing of an appeal of the Haryana government challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court order staying the state law on providing 75 per cent reservation in private sector jobs to local ca ...

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the introduction of a common syllabus and curriculum for children upto the age of 14 years across the country. ...

An appeal has been filed in the Supreme Court against the Karnataka High Court's interim order calling for restraint on students from wearing Hijab or any religious attire till the matter is pending with Court. ...

Pakistan's Supreme Court has suspended the verdict of the Peshawar High Court (PHC), postponing the second phase of local government elections in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa scheduled for March 27, local media reported. ...

New Delhi, Feb 10 The Supreme Court on Thursday said losing a good judicial officer without counselling and ... ...