City
Epaper

Supreme court to hear pleas against arrest of Newsclick founder and HR head on October 19

By ANI | Updated: October 18, 2023 13:30 IST

New Delhi [India], October 18 : The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for October 19 on the pleas ...

Open in App

New Delhi [India], October 18 : The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for October 19 on the pleas filed by Newsclick founder and Editor-in-Chief Prabir Purkayastha and the website's human resources head, Amit Chakraborty.

The two individuals are challenging their arrest and detention under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), which is related to alleged Chinese funding to promote anti-national propaganda.

A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and PK Mishra adjourned the matter to the following day. Justice Gavai mentioned that his fellow judge, Justice Mishra, also wishes to read the case files.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the petitioners, requested the bench to at least issue notice to the Delhi police. In response, the bench said it will hear the matter on the next day.

Prabir Purkayastha and Amit Chakraborty have filed petitions with the Supreme Court to challenge the Delhi High Court's decision to uphold the trial court's order that placed them in police custody. Subsequently, they were remanded to judicial custody.

Their arrest occurred on October 3, following an investigation by the Special Cell of the Delhi Police that involved the search of 30 locations related to the online news portal and its journalists.

The arrest was made under the UAPA based on allegations of receiving funds for promoting pro-China propaganda.

The FIR stated that a substantial amount of money had allegedly come from China to Newsclick to "disrupt the sovereignty of India" and foster disaffection against the country.

The investigative agency also claimed that Prabir Purkayastha had conspired with a group called the People's Alliance for Democracy and Secularism (PADS) to undermine the electoral process during the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.

The Delhi High Court had previously rejected their pleas, stating that it believed "serious offences affecting the stability, integrity, sovereignty, and national security have been alleged against the petitioner."

As a result, the court was not inclined to pass any favourable orders in their favour.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalTamil Nadu Bus Accident: Over 25 Passengers Injured After Private Omni Bus Overturns in Krishnagiri

BusinessAnil Ambani’s Reliance Power, Reliance Infra Stocks Jump as Investors Cheer New Developments

InternationalNSA Ajit Doval meets Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi to discuss border issues

Other Sports'We’re stronger than many teams this season': Telugu Titans captain Vijay Malik

CricketMaharaja Trophy KSCA T20: Gulbarga Mystics tame Hubli Tigers with four-wicket win

Business Realted Stories

BusinessEaseMyTrip targets higher customer retention and growth, deepens marketing tech stack with MoEngage

BusinessNHAI issues over 5 lakh FASTag annual toll passes, collects Rs 150 crore revenue

BusinessGlobe Civil Projects Delivers INR 67.70 Cr Consolidated Revenue in Q1 FY26

BusinessE-commerce, tech startups lead fresher hiring in India with 88 pc intent from July-Dec: Study

BusinessAbhishek Jagtap - The 23-Year-Old Dubai Tech Entrepreneur Revolutionizing Global Software Development Through CodeSquare Labs