City
Epaper

Supreme court to hear pleas against arrest of Newsclick founder and HR head on October 19

By ANI | Updated: October 18, 2023 13:30 IST

New Delhi [India], October 18 : The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for October 19 on the pleas ...

Open in App

New Delhi [India], October 18 : The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing for October 19 on the pleas filed by Newsclick founder and Editor-in-Chief Prabir Purkayastha and the website's human resources head, Amit Chakraborty.

The two individuals are challenging their arrest and detention under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), which is related to alleged Chinese funding to promote anti-national propaganda.

A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and PK Mishra adjourned the matter to the following day. Justice Gavai mentioned that his fellow judge, Justice Mishra, also wishes to read the case files.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the petitioners, requested the bench to at least issue notice to the Delhi police. In response, the bench said it will hear the matter on the next day.

Prabir Purkayastha and Amit Chakraborty have filed petitions with the Supreme Court to challenge the Delhi High Court's decision to uphold the trial court's order that placed them in police custody. Subsequently, they were remanded to judicial custody.

Their arrest occurred on October 3, following an investigation by the Special Cell of the Delhi Police that involved the search of 30 locations related to the online news portal and its journalists.

The arrest was made under the UAPA based on allegations of receiving funds for promoting pro-China propaganda.

The FIR stated that a substantial amount of money had allegedly come from China to Newsclick to "disrupt the sovereignty of India" and foster disaffection against the country.

The investigative agency also claimed that Prabir Purkayastha had conspired with a group called the People's Alliance for Democracy and Secularism (PADS) to undermine the electoral process during the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.

The Delhi High Court had previously rejected their pleas, stating that it believed "serious offences affecting the stability, integrity, sovereignty, and national security have been alleged against the petitioner."

As a result, the court was not inclined to pass any favourable orders in their favour.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai: 21-Year-Old Woman Molested in Dadar After Man Shows Porn Clip; Matunga Police on the Hunt

InternationalIndia, Oman hold Strategic Consultative Group meeting, discuss bilateral ties

NationalMumbai Crime Branch busts fake call centre selling viagra to US citizens; 8 arrested

Entertainment'Men in Black 5' in works with Chris Bremner scripting

NationalIndiGo Seeks Temporary FDTL Exemptions Amid Rising Flight Cancellations, Promises Operational Stability by Feb 10

Business Realted Stories

BusinessRBI Governor to Announce Policy Rate Today; Experts Split As Economists Expect Pause, Industry Eyes Cut

BusinessReliance Industries' rating raised to 'A-' from 'BBB+' by S&P Global, Outlook stable on improving cash flow

BusinessAI-driven sustainable development begins in Maha’s energy sector: CM Fadnavis

BusinessGovt’s commitment ensuring farmers get due respect and support: Tripura Minister

BusinessAndhra CM for grounding Partnership Summit MoUs in 45 days