City
Epaper

Allahabad HC sets aside dismissal on ground of live-in relationship

By IANS | Published: July 20, 2021 10:27 AM

Prayagraj (UP), July 20 The Allahabad high court has set aside the dismissal order of a government employee ...

Open in App

Prayagraj (UP), July 20 The Allahabad high court has set aside the dismissal order of a government employee who was removed from service for being in a live-in relationship with another woman.

The man is married and his wife is alive.

Justice Pankaj Bhatia, while passing the order, made it clear to the state authorities to pass a fresh order imposing minor penalties.

The order of dismissal was passed against the petitioner, Gore Lal Verma, solely on the ground that despite being married to one Laxmi Devi, who is alive, the petitioner maintained an extra-marital relationship with another lady named Hemlata Verma and both are staying together as husband and wife. He also has three children from the live-in relationship.

The authorities had recorded that the said conduct is against the provisions of the UP Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1956, and against the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act. As such, the order of dismissal from service was passed.

It was argued on behalf of the petitioner that in a similar matter in case of one Aneeta Yadav, this court, after considering, set aside the dismissal order.

However, an opportunity was granted to the respondents to award any minor penalty, if they so desire.

It was further argued that the said judgment was challenged in special leave to appeal and the Supreme Court refused to interfere. Consequently, the said special leave to appeal was dismissed.

After hearing the counsel, the court set aside his order of dismissal observing that considering the fact as well as the judgment of this court in the case of Aneeta Yadav, the petitioner is also entitled to the same benefit.

Consequently, the writ petition was allowed and the respondent authority was directed to reinstate the petitioner.

However, the court directed that the petitioner shall not be paid back wages from the date of dismissal till date.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Pankaj BhatiaGore lal vermaSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NEET-UG 2024 Exam Controversy: Shiv Sena UBT MP Priyanka Chaturvedi Writes Letter to Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, Demands For Transparent Investigation

NationalSupreme Court Interrogated Delhi Government: What Action Taken Against the Tanker Mafia?

NationalNEET-UG 2024 Exam Controversy: Supreme Court Seeks NTA Response On Plea To Conduct Fresh Exams

NEET-UG 2024 Exam Controversy: Supreme Court Issues Notice to NTA Over Paper Leak Allegations

NationalBreaking: SC To Hear Tomorrow Petition Seeking To Cancel NEET-UG 2024 Over Malpractice Allegations

International Realted Stories

InternationalDozens injured during anti-government demonstration in Armenia

InternationalUnicef urges Taliban to let girls study 1,000 days after school ban

InternationalPakistan Steel Mills terminates 562 daily wage workers

InternationalCargo ship attacked in Red Sea, crew member missing

InternationalHamas' requested changes on truce deal partially 'workable': Blinken