City
Epaper

1984 riots: 498 complaints under 1 FIR, 1 probe officer

By IANS | Published: January 15, 2020 6:42 PM

The special investigation team (SIT) headed by retired Delhi High Court judge Justice S.N. Dhingra, which has probed 186 cases of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, said the Delhi Police clubbed 498 complaints (rioting, arson, looting, burning, causing injuries and murders) under an omnibus FIR, and just one investigating officer was assigned to this case.

Open in App

"It was humanly impossible for one investigating officer to investigate 500 cases, to trace witnesses of each crime, to prepare challans and to proceed in the court against all the accused persons," said the SIT report.

The SIT in its report said that the perusal of the files shows that the FIRs were not registered by the police incident-wise or crime-wise. The report made several critical observations on the conduct of police while registering FIRs in rioting cases.

"If one FIR was registered in respect of one incident of murder-cum-riot-cum-arson-cum-looting, a house or shop in an area were clubbed in the same FIR and in the name of investigation almost nothing was done," said the report.

Harpreet Singh Hora, representing the victims, said "Clubbing of charges is not allowed for different offences. In cases where police have not put separate charges for distinct offences, then it is a violation of section 218 CrPC."

In the case of FIR 268/84 registered at police station Sultanpuri, the DCP sent 337 complaints, received after the riots, on various incidents to the police station for action. Instead of recording a separate FIR in respect of each incident, an omnibus FIR was recorded "in respect of all 337 incidents reported to the DCP by victims." Later all other incidents were also added to this FIR. "As a result this FIR had 498 incidents of rioting, arson, looting, burning, causing injuries and murders. One investigating officer was assigned to this case.

The SIT also highlighted the role of a Station House Officer (SHO), Survir Singh Tyagi, of police station Kalyanpuri in connection with FIR 503/91. The SIT indicted Tyagi for colluding with the rioters. "It was a case where Tyagi deliberately disarmed local Sikhs of their licenced arms so that rioters could make them victims and cause loss of life and property. He was suspended from service but later on reinstated and promoted as ACP," said the report. The SIT has recommended his case to the riot cell of the Delhi Police for action.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde was informed by the victims' lawyer that the report of the SIT is damning especially on the role of police officials allegedly involved and they would file an application seeking action against them.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, told the bench that they have accepted the recommendations made in the report and will take necessary steps.

(Sumit Saxena can be contacted at sumit.s@.in)

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: DCPSultanpuri
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalUttar Pradesh: Power Dept Cashier Goes Missing With Rs 52.5 Lakh Cash

NationalLucknow Police Installs Tyre Crushers to Check Wrong-Side Driving

AurangabadStone pelting incident, send force immediately

PoliticsDelhi floods: Police Commissioner visits Old Iron Bridge

NationalUP engineer loots money, loses in gaming, lands in jail

National Realted Stories

NationalConstituency Watch: Solapur Cong hopes to regain lost glory, BJP aims to score hat-trick by betting big on young blood

NationalNaMo App unveils 'Abki baar 400 paar' module, urges users to become '400 Paar Ambassadors'

NationalBajaj Bruzer 125: World's First CNG Bike Set to Revolutionize Two-Wheeler Market, Launch Date Revealed

NationalTrinamool's corruption akin to UPA's during its 10-year rule: PM Modi

NationalTelangana HC sets aside BRS MLC's election